Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-20-2008, 12:57 PM   #51
MichaelP
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: QWEBEC Corporate Office
Posts: 7,124
50. I beat Julius
MichaelP is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 12:58 PM   #52
MichaelP
Registered User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: QWEBEC Corporate Office
Posts: 7,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks View Post
Thanks for the heads up, Brandon

I guess it's time to put the pissed off attitude aside for a moment and draft up a view of our concerns. I am definitely not happy about this demon is raising its head again.

I know allot of people will probably chose to ignore this, thinking it will go away, like last time. If we don't take the time to stick together and send in our comments then we get what we deserve.

I personally do not want to be under the rule of a guy whose main concern is money, not the welfare of children, as he built his platform on last time around.
Again, we can beat this lawley guy and his nonferrous ways if we all take the time to draft up reasonable responses to this bogus attempt to protect children.
WORDS !

.xxx top domain would create a virtual internet ghetto. Too easy for any ISP to block adult content access to surfers...
MichaelP is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:11 PM   #53
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Pipe dream outcome:

.XXX gets approved

congress passes a law to make .XXX mandatory

obscenity cases for violating community standards is no longer prosecutable because a .XXX labeling law would show federal/national acceptance of the content.


---

This alternate universe should put the fear of god in religious folks to do what they can to ensure .XXX does not get created to lead to this ending




Fight the unintended consequences!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:16 PM   #54
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
in the real world, maxhardcorexxx.com gets nailed for obscenity, in Bizarro World, maxhardcore.xxx wouldn't



Fight the things that make you go hmmmmmmmm!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:24 PM   #55
Nysus
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,817
Not this again. But ya, $100 million / year projected revenues and if they have 100,000 pre-registrations (for actual money) then they have the bank to push.
__________________
What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now

Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*

See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645
Nysus is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:38 PM   #56
gotekix
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 243
I really hope this doesn't happen. The internet is fine the way it is. These guys just want to make a few bucks.
gotekix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:40 PM   #57
LadyMischief
Orgasms N Such!
 
LadyMischief's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Posts: 18,135
Again!? Am I the only one feeling deja-vu here? :P
__________________

ICQ 3522039
Content Manager - orgasm.com
[email protected]
LadyMischief is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:42 PM   #58
tranza
ICQ: 197-556-237
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: BRASIL !!!
Posts: 57,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by munki View Post
It's back? wtf...
Hey men this gif scary me, What it mean?
__________________
I'm just a newbie.
tranza is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:46 PM   #59
RevengeBucks_Monica
Confirmed User
 
RevengeBucks_Monica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 775
This really gets under my skin. I don't even want to get started giving my opinion, but I agree it's an absolutely AWFUL idea and it better not go through.
__________________
The ORIGINAL & BEST CONVERTING EX-GIRLFRIEND REVENGE site!

Revenge Bucks - Now with Morphing RSS Feeds!

Email: monica @ revengebucks.com | ICQ:138-027-662 | AIM:RevengeMonica
RevengeBucks_Monica is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:46 PM   #60
media
Confirmed Moneymaker
 
media's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Eugene, OR It's Like Jail, Only with Trees!
Posts: 9,851
Blah blah.. this is just some spin so that they can soak up more registration fees while the domains go nowhere.. fuck .XXX

I do not support something that is so easliy regulated and censored via isp's such as .xxx

forcing someone into a .xxx extension is censorship..
__________________
I'm here for the violence!
media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 01:49 PM   #61
Compdoctor
Confirmed User
 
Compdoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: True 3D Content
Posts: 1,937
here's another bump
Compdoctor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 02:09 PM   #62
Quentin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
Pipe dream outcome:

.XXX gets approved

congress passes a law to make .XXX mandatory

obscenity cases for violating community standards is no longer prosecutable because a .XXX labeling law would show federal/national acceptance of the content.


---

This alternate universe should put the fear of god in religious folks to do what they can to ensure .XXX does not get created to lead to this ending




Fight the unintended consequences!
There's really no way that unintended consequence could occur. The very nature of the Miller test defies the notion of having a national/federal standard -- the whole idea is that each individual community (as problematic as that term is) is subject to its own 'standard,' which is defined by a jury selected from the given community, only AFTER an indictment is entered.

Second, this pipe dream hypothetical also assumes that .XXX's content policies would be open enough to approve all the same types and categories of content that we currently publish on our .coms. This is hardly a given, as ICM has not proposed any set of best practices or content policies yet (correct me if I'm wrong) and IFFOR, the body that would be responsible for setting such policies, has not been defined yet, itself.

This brings me around to my primary reason for being against .XXX: I don't know what it is.

Personally, I have a very hard time supporting things that are pretty much entirely undefined. It's like being asked to back a politician without being told who they are, which party they belong to, or what their platform is. No thanks.
__________________
Q. Boyer
Quentin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 02:14 PM   #63
broots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
Could somebody point me to the relevant article that stipulates that .XXX would be regulated once it is allowed as a TLD? Sounds to me that .XXX is more of an "opt-in" kind of deal and that being said, nothing more than a money-grab for the associated registrar (like .info, for example). I doubt that ICANN will ever become instrumental in regulating content.
broots is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 02:40 PM   #64
pornguy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pornguy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
BUMP for the later crew.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
pornguy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 03:31 PM   #65
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
additional background info/history at the archived pages of fightthedotxxx.com at archive.org
. I had just let the domain lapse for renewal and its no longer a live site.

List of those who had taken a public stand against .XXX This list was sent to ICANN when they were doing their voting, last updated: 6-mar-07 :

Free Speech Coalition (trade association)

Adult Video News (AVN)

Xbiz

Hustler

Wicked Pictures

Private Entertainment

Tom Hymes (adult industry advocate)

Home Grown Video (paysites)

YNOT (webmaster resource site)

Adam & Eve (novelties and video)

SmashBucks (paysites)

LightSpeed (paysites)

Sunny Dollars (paysites)

Webmaster Paradise (content plugins)

ATKINGDOM (paysites)

Porn Profit (paysites)

The SCORE Group (paysites)

HotMovies.com (video on demand)

Choker Traffic (traffic broker)

Quentin Boyer (individual)

MojoHost (ISP)

Yanks Cash (paysites)

Sex Pictures Pass (AVS)

Pimps Promo (marketing)

Team Click Cash (paysites)

Amazing Content (content producer)

Payserve (paysites)

AskJolene (search engine)

Nysus (internet entrepreneur)

Twistys (paysites)

arikaames.com (paysite)

kickass.com (paysites)

Len Palmer (internet entrepreneur)

Marc (formerly of Matrix Content)

Harley Girl (webgoddess)

Iron Griffin Media (free sites)

AdultWebmasterLabor.com (webmaster resource)

Lowkey Productions (video production)

tiffinivids.com (Amateur Video)

afsac.org (advocacy group)

InGayPorn.com (blog)

12clicks (internet bon vivant)

ObjectCube (software for adult)

Babagirl (adult webmistress)

The Adult Broker (marketing consultant)

PPPcard.net (payment solution)

XXXRewards/Karups (paysite)

MikeSouth.com (video producer/director)

Aly (industry personality)

SplitInfinity Networks, INC (webhost)

OC3 Networks (webhost/ISP)

Wasteland.com (paysite)

Fredricks Media Group (Producers/ web sites)

3Fall Productions (producers, paysites)

bellavendetta.com (fetish website)

Wolfy (webmaster)

Internet Co. (paysites)

DarkLady (journalist)

Consumption Junction (free site)

NichePay (paysites)

JDL "juicy" Media Group (Consulting Firm)

WorldWideContent.com (content provider)

sponsorslist.com (webmaster resource site)

Spunkycash (paysites)

Serpent Studios S.A. (paysites)

John Foulds "jayeff" (webmaster)

ViceReview.com (paysite reviews)

URLSX.com (webmaster resource)

eAdultIndustry.com (webmaster resource)

sponsorspecs.com (adult sponsor resource)

interracial-living.com (paysites)

AAA News (online retailer)

BBS-LA (ISP)

Mob Bucks (paysites)

KB (marketeur/industry personality)

BlueToon Media (paysites)

WWW. COM INC (concerned tax payer)

J. D. Obenberger and Associates (attorney)

Eric M. Bernstein (attorney)

Eric Frey (webmaster)

AEBN (video on-demand)

Silvercash (paysites)

WebOverdrive.com (webmaster resource)

SunUp Media Group, Inc. (paysites, content)

SunDown Media Group, Inc. (paysites)

Ademia Multimedia (plugins)

National A-1 Internet (ISP)

JQMedia aka Jays XXX Links (traffic master)

OC Cash (paysites)

MacDaddy Bucks (paysites)

tony404 (photographer/editor)

iAlien LLC (designer)

Laughing Loon Productions, L.L.C (webmaster)

Laughing Loon Productions, L.L.C (webmaster)

Eye Candi, LLC

Octogy Media Partners, LLC

SkyFu Media LLC

JDL Media Group

SAP Investments

JJB Inc

Royal Trading Group

AADC and Associates

Deck Swabbers Inc.

Verified Networks Inc.

Verified AVS Inc.

GetVerified.com

Webmaster Paradise (content producer)

Star Marketing Group LLC

F.U.B.A.R. Webmasters

Jaguar Webmedia

Adult Image Brokers

WTF Media Inc.

Dave Cummings Productions

E4AProductions.com

Shane's World

RAGECASH

EXTREME PAYCHECKS

SmutDealer.com

VAS Media Group

Housewivescash.com

123bill (online payment processor)

Axis-Adult.com

Web Wizard, Inc.

HowIgotRich.com

After Shock Media

xxxkey.com

traffictitan.com

Adult Rental

Platinum Bucks

Duke Dollars

Rhinopays

cazador media (websites)

media conductor (streaming media provider)

DVDsforaBuck.com

Pretty Girls Cash (paysites)

69kHz Enterprises (Online Adult Entertainment)

Gaybucks

adultmovieclub.com

triplexcash.com

STICKI

RamJetVideo.com

MarkiesBigDickClub.com

intimatefashionz.com

sexshowcase.net

Legit Cash

J2Media.net (V_RocKs - Websites/PPC/Adult Blogs)

DragonCom Inc (paysites, freesitess)

Greenguy Marketing, Inc (freesites, webmaster community)

DatingGold

AffordableSiteDesign.com

SurferBucks.com


(there are alot of names that you know that are not on this list. Many didn't want to take a public stand against .XXX for fear of losing their traffic deals -even though they were against .XXX- with those who did support .XXX )


Fight the Flashback!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2008, 07:19 PM   #66
Redrob
Confirmed User
 
Redrob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks.
Posts: 4,790
I get a creepy sense of "Deja Vu."
Redrob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 08:00 AM   #67
Nikki_Licks
Confirmed User
 
Nikki_Licks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
Early morning bump
__________________
Amateur Content
ICQ: 292 356 077
Nikki_Licks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 10:19 AM   #68
davecummings
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,922
.xxx might well be the final blow to most of us----tube sites, 2257, and extensive "tours" on pay sites are small problems (relatively, at least) compared to what I think .xxx could do to Internet porn.

I'd love for someone to post an authentic list of companies/sites who supported .xxx (by not joining those of us who voiced concern to ICANN last year); PLEASE!!!!!!!!!??????????
__________________
Dave Cummings
www.davecummings.com
www.davecummings.tv
San Diego

Email--- [email protected]
davecummings is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 10:41 AM   #69
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by davecummings View Post
.xxx might well be the final blow to most of us----tube sites, 2257, and extensive "tours" on pay sites are small problems (relatively, at least) compared to what I think .xxx could do to Internet porn.

I'd love for someone to post an authentic list of companies/sites who supported .xxx (by not joining those of us who voiced concern to ICANN last year); PLEASE!!!!!!!!!??????????
That would be a interesting list to see but it wont happen in our lifetimes.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 12:29 PM   #70
Unlimited
Confirmed User
 
Unlimited's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,301
time for a new bump
Unlimited is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 01:49 PM   #71
Major (Tom)
Anti Communist
 
Major (Tom)'s Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Null
Posts: 29,857
why dont people just start mentioning names? my mom told me to never mess with the way a man feeds his family.
__________________
My mother said, to get things done
You'd better not mess with Major Tom
Major (Tom) is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2008, 02:50 PM   #72
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker View Post
why dont people just start mentioning names? my mom told me to never mess with the way a man feeds his family.
That's very true but when their actions could cut off thousands from feeding their families. Makes you think for a moment.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 05:19 PM   #73
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Fight the bump!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 08:03 PM   #74
Redrob
Confirmed User
 
Redrob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a refrigerator box by the tracks.
Posts: 4,790
Hump the Bump!
Redrob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2008, 11:21 PM   #75
DirtyRider
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 819
I had a feeling this would come back... again and again. I don't support it and heres a bump.
__________________
hello
DirtyRider is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 12:38 AM   #76
MikeHawk
Confirmed User
 
MikeHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In bed with Harley Girl....Not sleepin
Posts: 6,683
Just wished this would go away........

.xxx is a bad idea, its been a bad idea all along...

but money talks, we shall see....
__________________
THE AMBUSH INTERVIEW
MikeHawk is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 03:14 AM   #77
Manowar
jellyfish  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
what a surprise, .xxx rears its head again
Manowar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 03:42 AM   #78
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
best designer on GFY
 
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384
Posts: 30,307
iAlien Still stands opposed as well.

If there is a run up for Icann to have another meeting regarding .XXX that requests Industry people to sign letters of opposition please let me know Brandon!


Guys don't worry about it to much before Icann can approve they must consider and have a vote. If the industry shows it's teeth like it did last time .XXX will still fall in flames.

So it is important to keep some news letter to webmasters or find info if that event should ever come again.

The guy that is behind .XXX is well funded and much cash he wont go away easily but we can keep slapping the fuck head down to prevent .XXX from ever happening.

The whole thing needs a redraw from head to toe, the current version .XXX is nothing but a money grab that does nothing to serve our industry in the remotest of sense. I will officially say that I would back an adult TLD if it were drawn properly.

Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 06-23-2008 at 03:45 AM..
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 05:35 AM   #79
Zester
Confirmed User
 
Zester's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
oh shit....this .XXX thing is like an EX wife....
__________________
* Mainstream ? $65 per sale
* new male contraception
Zester is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 05:57 AM   #80
Fabien
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,787
This thing has to die PERIOD !
If you're afraid about tube sites and torrents, well this is nothing compare to what .xxx would do to our biz !

It would be so easy to "ghettoized" everything. Like make a huge international online "red light".
It would be so easy after for ISP's to ban access to .xxx extentions. Now as i see it, Obama will be the next president ? Do you REALLY REALLY want .xxx domains ?
Fabien is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:28 AM   #81
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
shakeup of internet proposed (bbc):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7468855.stm




'Shake-up' for internet proposed
By Darren Waters
Technology editor, BBC News website

Cable
Icann oversees the structure of the net

The net could see its biggest transformation in decades if plans to open up the address system are passed.

The net's regulators will vote on Thursday to decide if the strict rules on so-called top level domain names, such as .com or .uk, can be relaxed.

If approved, it could allow companies to turn their brands into domain names while individuals could also carve out their own corner of the net.

The move could also see the launch of .xxx, after years of wrangling.

Top level domains are currently limited to individual countries, such as .uk (UK) or .it (Italy), as well as to commerce, .com, and to institutional organisations, such as .net, or .org.

To get around the restrictions, some companies have used the current system to their own ends.

For example, the Polynesia island nation Tuvalu, has leased the use of the .tv address to many television firms.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann), which acts a sort of regulator for the net, as well as overseeing the domain name system, has been working towards opening up net addresses for the last three years.


It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet
Dr Paul Twomey, Icann

The plan would also allow for the new domain names to be internationalised, and so could be written in scripts for Asian and Arabic languages.

Dr Paul Twomey, chief executive of Icann, told BBC News that the proposals would result in the biggest change to the way the internet worked in decades.

"The impact of this will be different in different parts of the world. But it will allow groups, communities and business to express their identities online.

"Like the United States in the 19th Century, we are in the process of opening up new real estate, new land, and people will go out and claim parts of that land and use it for various reasons they have.

"It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet."

Arbitration process

Hundreds of new domain names could be created by the end of the year, rising to thousands in the future.

HAVE YOUR SAY

I'm all for tighter regulation, not opening it up further which would only facilitate fraud

Karen, London



Icann says any string of letters can be registered as a domain, but there will be an independent arbitration process for people with grounds for objection.

The openness of the new system could pave the way for a .xxx domain name, after more than half a decade of wrangling between its backers and Icann.

The latest attempt to launch .xxx was rejected by Icann last year on the grounds that approval would put the agency into the position of a content regulator.

When asked about the possibility of a .xxx domain name, Dr Twomey repeated only that the new system would be "open to anyone".

The move could yet be blocked as the independent arbitration panel can reject domains based on "morality or public order" grounds.

Dr Twomey said Icann was still working through how much the application fee to register a domain name will be, but it is expected to be at least several thousand dollars.

'Cost recovery'

"We are doing this on a cost recovery basis. We've already spent $10m on this," he said.

Individuals will be able to register a domain based on their own name, or any other string of letters, as long as they can show a "business plan and technical capacity".

While companies will be able to secure domain names based on their intellectual property easily, some domain names could become subject to contention and a bidding war.

Dr Twomey said: "If there is a dispute, we will try and get the parties together to work it out. But if that fails there will be an auction and the domain will go to the highest bidder."



Fight the copy/paste!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:35 AM   #82
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
ICANN is looking to get rid of the "sponsored TLD" part, so if they do that, .XXX wouldn't have to prove that they have adult community support (which they don't)

So .XXX can come back with a new application, and get approved.

I said this from the beginning, that if there were no IFFOR part, this would be just another TLD and adult industry couldn't stop it.. and from there, its an open market.

Having IFFOR and all the rules that IFFOR would place on .XXX is what screwed up the .XXX application to begin with.


Fight the .xxx!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:36 AM   #83
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
this was something that Jeffrey Douglas, Tom Hymes, and myself were looking at about a year ago... the ICANN review process is very vague, and the reviiew panel has no power.. they can come up with a decision that is opposite of the board decision, but it means nothing.

There is nothing the bylaws that stated that the icann board had to listen to the independent review.

There was a guy who was asking for independent review over .travel, and he he kept banging his head on the icann walls, because they had not real clear procedures for a review and what it really mean in the end.

There are alot of ICANN observers that would love to get clarification on the independent review panel, so the only good thing that will come out of this, is that lawley may help to make that process clear, when .XXX gets shot down again

Fight the don't let the door hit your arse on the way out!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
Is it a certainty that there will be a public comment period relating to the independent review? I didn't catch any reference to a public comment period in ICM's request for review, but I'm sure they don't really see an additional public comment period as being in their best interest, so that might have been a conscious omission on their part.

Hopefully, the request that the review board "declare that ICANN must immediately execute a registry agreement on terms and conditions substantially similar to ICM's draft registry agreement" proposed in Feb 2007 either proves a bridge too far for the review board, or executing such an agreement would trigger more public comment. On its face, the language of that request sounds like ICM is going for a knockout punch via the review board -- an attempt to bypass the question of public comment and more internal debate by the ICANN board, and simply execute the agreement pursuant to the demand of the review panel.

Of course, if the ICANN board can simply ignore the review panel's decision, ICM's individual requests relating to the independent review board's declarations could be moot, anyway.

Hopefully all of this will be clarified when ICM's request for review is answered/acted upon.
I see this thread is bumped and it's good, as it raises awarness, but really, does anyone know what the procedure will be? When can we expect the Review Panel to meet? Have the panelists been appointed so far? How much time do they have for that and for taking a decision?

Looks like no one here can really answer these questions.
I haven't also noticed any attention to this subject from the mainstream media yet.
Neither a mention on icann.org website about the ICM's Petition.

Hopefully this is just the last act of desperation from ICM and I would be surprised if this Panel suddenly found some ground for reversing last year's Board's decision.

So..hm... I guess no one can answer the above questions.
This thread can be still bumped I guess, although as it seems right now, there's no need (or: no possibility) so submit any public comments to ICANN anyway.

Basically, if I understand it right, nothing is happening right now, ICANN got the petition and they're wondering how to handle it I guess.
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:44 AM   #84
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
shakeup of internet proposed (bbc):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7468855.stm




'Shake-up' for internet proposed
By Darren Waters
Technology editor, BBC News website

Cable
Icann oversees the structure of the net

The net could see its biggest transformation in decades if plans to open up the address system are passed.

The net's regulators will vote on Thursday to decide if the strict rules on so-called top level domain names, such as .com or .uk, can be relaxed.

If approved, it could allow companies to turn their brands into domain names while individuals could also carve out their own corner of the net.

The move could also see the launch of .xxx, after years of wrangling.

Top level domains are currently limited to individual countries, such as .uk (UK) or .it (Italy), as well as to commerce, .com, and to institutional organisations, such as .net, or .org.

To get around the restrictions, some companies have used the current system to their own ends.

For example, the Polynesia island nation Tuvalu, has leased the use of the .tv address to many television firms.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann), which acts a sort of regulator for the net, as well as overseeing the domain name system, has been working towards opening up net addresses for the last three years.


It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet
Dr Paul Twomey, Icann

The plan would also allow for the new domain names to be internationalised, and so could be written in scripts for Asian and Arabic languages.

Dr Paul Twomey, chief executive of Icann, told BBC News that the proposals would result in the biggest change to the way the internet worked in decades.

"The impact of this will be different in different parts of the world. But it will allow groups, communities and business to express their identities online.

"Like the United States in the 19th Century, we are in the process of opening up new real estate, new land, and people will go out and claim parts of that land and use it for various reasons they have.

"It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet."

Arbitration process

Hundreds of new domain names could be created by the end of the year, rising to thousands in the future.

HAVE YOUR SAY

I'm all for tighter regulation, not opening it up further which would only facilitate fraud

Karen, London



Icann says any string of letters can be registered as a domain, but there will be an independent arbitration process for people with grounds for objection.

The openness of the new system could pave the way for a .xxx domain name, after more than half a decade of wrangling between its backers and Icann.

The latest attempt to launch .xxx was rejected by Icann last year on the grounds that approval would put the agency into the position of a content regulator.

When asked about the possibility of a .xxx domain name, Dr Twomey repeated only that the new system would be "open to anyone".

The move could yet be blocked as the independent arbitration panel can reject domains based on "morality or public order" grounds.

Dr Twomey said Icann was still working through how much the application fee to register a domain name will be, but it is expected to be at least several thousand dollars.

'Cost recovery'

"We are doing this on a cost recovery basis. We've already spent $10m on this," he said.

Individuals will be able to register a domain based on their own name, or any other string of letters, as long as they can show a "business plan and technical capacity".

While companies will be able to secure domain names based on their intellectual property easily, some domain names could become subject to contention and a bidding war.

Dr Twomey said: "If there is a dispute, we will try and get the parties together to work it out. But if that fails there will be an auction and the domain will go to the highest bidder."



Fight the copy/paste!
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
ICANN is looking to get rid of the "sponsored TLD" part, so if they do that, .XXX wouldn't have to prove that they have adult community support (which they don't)

So .XXX can come back with a new application, and get approved.

I said this from the beginning, that if there were no IFFOR part, this would be just another TLD and adult industry couldn't stop it.. and from there, its an open market.

Having IFFOR and all the rules that IFFOR would place on .XXX is what screwed up the .XXX application to begin with.


Fight the .xxx!
Wow, that's quite big news there.
Don't really know what to say about this, other than that I hope that ICANN will vote against going in this totally new direction.
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:46 AM   #85
Vexes
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Besides making posts on porn message boards, has anyone done anything substantial to fight this? Any tradegroup formed to lobby ICANN?
  Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 10:24 AM   #86
Nikki_Licks
Confirmed User
 
Nikki_Licks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionx View Post
::bump::

and -

fightdotxxx.com for sale. make offers.
Good domain

And an early morning bump for the cause.
__________________
Amateur Content
ICQ: 292 356 077
Nikki_Licks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 10:52 AM   #87
broots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
ICANN is never going to become that sort of regulatory body. So far, I haven't read anything which remotely suggests otherwise.
broots is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 12:15 PM   #88
davecummings
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,922
This is potentially SCARRY:-(.
__________________
Dave Cummings
www.davecummings.com
www.davecummings.tv
San Diego

Email--- [email protected]
davecummings is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 01:11 PM   #89
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexes View Post
Besides making posts on porn message boards, has anyone done anything substantial to fight this? Any tradegroup formed to lobby ICANN?
FSC did some lobbying, but the bulk was webmasters taking the time to post up the ICANN board for public comment. ON the last go-around, we over 1,000 webmasters post up in opposition.

right now, its an internal ICANN issue, but ICANN does need to be reminded that the adult community does not want .XXX

Fight the .$$$
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 01:30 PM   #90
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
shakeup of internet proposed (bbc):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7468855.stm




'Shake-up' for internet proposed
By Darren Waters
Technology editor, BBC News website

Cable
Icann oversees the structure of the net

The net could see its biggest transformation in decades if plans to open up the address system are passed.

The net's regulators will vote on Thursday to decide if the strict rules on so-called top level domain names, such as .com or .uk, can be relaxed.

If approved, it could allow companies to turn their brands into domain names while individuals could also carve out their own corner of the net.

The move could also see the launch of .xxx, after years of wrangling.

Top level domains are currently limited to individual countries, such as .uk (UK) or .it (Italy), as well as to commerce, .com, and to institutional organisations, such as .net, or .org.

To get around the restrictions, some companies have used the current system to their own ends.

For example, the Polynesia island nation Tuvalu, has leased the use of the .tv address to many television firms.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann), which acts a sort of regulator for the net, as well as overseeing the domain name system, has been working towards opening up net addresses for the last three years.


It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet
Dr Paul Twomey, Icann

The plan would also allow for the new domain names to be internationalised, and so could be written in scripts for Asian and Arabic languages.

Dr Paul Twomey, chief executive of Icann, told BBC News that the proposals would result in the biggest change to the way the internet worked in decades.

"The impact of this will be different in different parts of the world. But it will allow groups, communities and business to express their identities online.

"Like the United States in the 19th Century, we are in the process of opening up new real estate, new land, and people will go out and claim parts of that land and use it for various reasons they have.

"It's a massive increase in the geography of the real estate of the internet."

Arbitration process

Hundreds of new domain names could be created by the end of the year, rising to thousands in the future.

HAVE YOUR SAY

I'm all for tighter regulation, not opening it up further which would only facilitate fraud

Karen, London



Icann says any string of letters can be registered as a domain, but there will be an independent arbitration process for people with grounds for objection.

The openness of the new system could pave the way for a .xxx domain name, after more than half a decade of wrangling between its backers and Icann.

The latest attempt to launch .xxx was rejected by Icann last year on the grounds that approval would put the agency into the position of a content regulator.

When asked about the possibility of a .xxx domain name, Dr Twomey repeated only that the new system would be "open to anyone".

The move could yet be blocked as the independent arbitration panel can reject domains based on "morality or public order" grounds.

Dr Twomey said Icann was still working through how much the application fee to register a domain name will be, but it is expected to be at least several thousand dollars.

'Cost recovery'

"We are doing this on a cost recovery basis. We've already spent $10m on this," he said.

Individuals will be able to register a domain based on their own name, or any other string of letters, as long as they can show a "business plan and technical capacity".

While companies will be able to secure domain names based on their intellectual property easily, some domain names could become subject to contention and a bidding war.

Dr Twomey said: "If there is a dispute, we will try and get the parties together to work it out. But if that fails there will be an auction and the domain will go to the highest bidder."



Fight the copy/paste!
I just read this. That article doesn't make things look good. If the approve this change it could open the door for .xxx and then all bets are off.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:14 PM   #91
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I just read this. That article doesn't make things look good. If the approve this change it could open the door for .xxx and then all bets are off.
exactly

or .sex or .porn


Fight the TLDs!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 02:44 PM   #92
broots
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I just read this. That article doesn't make things look good. If the approve this change it could open the door for .xxx and then all bets are off.
Why? I really don't get it.
broots is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 03:24 PM   #93
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by broots View Post
Why? I really don't get it.
Well, the .xxx TLD is a somewhat major thing. There could be some serious legal issues involved. Say for example you paid a ton of money for the domain porn.com and you spent even more developing it. You could make the argument that you then should be given the first dibs to buy porn.xxx and if someone else buys it you might then claim that you own the name rights and lawsuits can start flying. This can be easily fixed by ICM allowing the owners of a .com the option to be the first to buy the .xxx version of their name but they will most likely want to auction off the premium names so this may not happen.

What could eventually be more difficult is if the government then decides that all adult material needs to be on a .xxx. They could easily pass that law. There is no way of knowing if it would hold up in court, but they could pass it. Let's not forget the courts ruled during the COPA trial publishing to the internet is not a guaranteed right so they could rule that you still get freedom to publish your porn, you just have to follow the rules. If this would happen it could make filtering and blocking access much easier. That could be a good thing because freeloaders would be cut down and those that really want porn and are not just surfing out of curiosity would pay/ask for access to it. The problem then comes back to the original problem which is then who owns what. Say they don't allow owners of .coms to get first crack at the .xxx of their name. so now you paid a ton for porn.com, someone else owns porn.xxx and you now have to shut down porn.com or spend another truckload of money buying porn.xxx. Is that fair?

there are other potential issues like some countries simply not recognizing the .xxx extension and other censorship issues. IMO a .xxx would cause more trouble than it would solve.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 04:22 PM   #94
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
nice write up from bob at xbiz : ICANN to Consider Free-Form Top-Level Domains

excerpt:

CYBERSPACE ? In a move that could give the .XXX top-level domain a back-door onto the Internet, ICANN will vote Thursday on a proposal to relax requirements for top-level domains.

If approved, the proposal could potentially let companies and individuals make up their own top-level domains in a fashion similar to how some countries have made use of the top-level domains assigned to them........


(more)





Fight the link challenged!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:26 PM   #95
Nikki_Licks
Confirmed User
 
Nikki_Licks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404 View Post
That would be a interesting list to see but it wont happen in our lifetimes.
I would also like to see this list.

What I would like to know is, isn't that list open to the public, if it did in fact exists? This lawley guy claims to have many that preregistered the .xxx domains or am I wrong?

lawley also claims he has mounds of documentation by individuals that back his bogus movement, but I don't think anyone has seen proof of this and we should have access to that list too.

If I am right then anyone should be able to see that list, especially when he is using it as leverage to sway ICANN.

Things just are not adding up!
__________________
Amateur Content
ICQ: 292 356 077
Nikki_Licks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:37 PM   #96
Nikki_Licks
Confirmed User
 
Nikki_Licks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent View Post
nice write up from bob at xbiz : ICANN to Consider Free-Form Top-Level Domains

excerpt:

CYBERSPACE ? In a move that could give the .XXX top-level domain a back-door onto the Internet, ICANN will vote Thursday on a proposal to relax requirements for top-level domains.

If approved, the proposal could potentially let companies and individuals make up their own top-level domains in a fashion similar to how some countries have made use of the top-level domains assigned to them........


(more)





Fight the link challenged!
I smell lawley all over this. What a cleaver way to slip the .xxx TLD in.
This guy is like a termite, he is going to keep chewing away at this until he gets his way or we take a stand against him and his nefarious ways, again and again.
If he gets in the back door, it's only a matter of time until he wants more!

This guy is not thinking about you, children or anything that could help the system, but rather thinking about lining his fat pockets with everyone's money......
__________________
Amateur Content
ICQ: 292 356 077
Nikki_Licks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 07:53 PM   #97
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by broots View Post
Why? I really don't get it.
Under this new system anything can be a new domain. For example Coke could have a .coke so they could have sites like diet.coke, cherry.coke. Apple could have mac.apple, ipod.apple, iphone.apple, etc etc. So someone could create .xxx and the government could make .xxx manatory.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2008, 09:31 PM   #98
Nikki_Licks
Confirmed User
 
Nikki_Licks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
Under this new system anything can be a new domain. For example Coke could have a .coke so they could have sites like diet.coke, cherry.coke. Apple could have mac.apple, ipod.apple, iphone.apple, etc etc. So someone could create .xxx and the government could make .xxx manatory.
Exactly!!
And sneaking through the back door seems to be his new thing

Has this new system been in the works for a while now with ICANN, or did it just come to light because lawley has his feathers in an uproar?
__________________
Amateur Content
ICQ: 292 356 077
Nikki_Licks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 03:03 AM   #99
kane
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: portland, OR
Posts: 20,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by broots View Post
Could somebody point me to the relevant article that stipulates that .XXX would be regulated once it is allowed as a TLD? Sounds to me that .XXX is more of an "opt-in" kind of deal and that being said, nothing more than a money-grab for the associated registrar (like .info, for example). I doubt that ICANN will ever become instrumental in regulating content.
As far as I am aware there is no such actual plan in place to make .xxx mandatory if it is allowed to pass. ICM (the people trying to get it to pass) have even said they strongly oppose that happening and would set aside some of the money that they earn from selling the domains to fight anything like that. So if it is allowed to pass and .xxx is born at first it will be nothing more than another TLD just like .com, .net, .ca and so on.

Where the worry comes into play is with the US government. They love making statements and what better statement then to pass a law mandating that all porn sites have to reside on a .xxx. Of course only about half the sites on the web are owned by people in the US so there would still be many sites that didn't have to follow that rule. Icann would not have to be involved at all. It would be pretty simple. They find a porn site that is not on .xxx, find out who owns it and if they are US based, bust them. There could also be a very simple step from there to force ISPs to block the .xxx by default and make people call into the ISPs and request that they be given access to it. Most people would not because they would be too embarrased to call up their cable company and tell them they want access to porn, especially since there would still be plenty of porn out there from Non-US based sites.

This is all worst case scenario, but things like this are often a slippery slope and once you go down that road it is hard to turn back so it is best to avoid the first step all together if possible.
kane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 04:47 AM   #100
Zester
Confirmed User
 
Zester's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
As far as I am aware there is no such actual plan in place to make .xxx mandatory if it is allowed to pass. ICM (the people trying to get it to pass) have even said they strongly oppose that happening and would set aside some of the money that they earn from selling the domains to fight anything like that. So if it is allowed to pass and .xxx is born at first it will be nothing more than another TLD just like .com, .net, .ca and so on.

Where the worry comes into play is with the US government. They love making statements and what better statement then to pass a law mandating that all porn sites have to reside on a .xxx. Of course only about half the sites on the web are owned by people in the US so there would still be many sites that didn't have to follow that rule. Icann would not have to be involved at all. It would be pretty simple. They find a porn site that is not on .xxx, find out who owns it and if they are US based, bust them. There could also be a very simple step from there to force ISPs to block the .xxx by default and make people call into the ISPs and request that they be given access to it. Most people would not because they would be too embarrased to call up their cable company and tell them they want access to porn, especially since there would still be plenty of porn out there from Non-US based sites.

This is all worst case scenario, but things like this are often a slippery slope and once you go down that road it is hard to turn back so it is best to avoid the first step all together if possible.
regarding non us based porn sites that use a .xxx:
can ICANN take the domain from them for that ? is there no one that can stop non us based webmasters from putting XXX content on a non .XXX domain ?

once this all goes down that is... and it will I think...
__________________
* Mainstream ? $65 per sale
* new male contraception
Zester is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.