Originally Posted by BFT3K

Yeah, even mentally handicapped, brain dead, morons like the demon, should be allowed to post on slow days. It is only right that we give societies rejects a chance to share their incoherent, and utterly ridiculous thoughts and opinions.... as meaningless as they may be.

Originally Posted by The Demon

You gotta love it. I call a stupid kid a moron, he responds with the same insult. Ah the simple minded are hilarious.

Originally Posted by Young

What was the tax rate a few decades ago on the rich? 80%? 90%?

Be glad it's at only 40%.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Hi My Troll....

No way you're a lawyer, you couldn't argue yourself out of a wet paper bag.

Originally Posted by The Demon

You wouldn't know. You don't have the IQ to be involved in a debate.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Wealthy, businesses would pay about $1 trillion more

Source: MSNBC For a good bit more info...

Key Points:

— It would also impose nearly $1 trillion in higher taxes on couples making more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000 by not renewing tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush.

— It would give companies a $5,000 tax credit for each new worker they hire in 2010.

— Businesses that increase wages or hours for their current workers in 2010 would be reimbursed for the extra Social Security payroll taxes they would pay.

— The Making Work Pay tax credit provides families with up to $800 a year and individuals up to $400 a year through small increases in their weekly pay. Extending the tax credit through 2011 would save them $61 billion.

— Raise the top two income tax rates for individuals, from 33 percent and 35 percent, to 36 percent and 39.6 percent, respectively. Unless Congress intervenes, those rates will rise next Jan. 1 when Bush's tax cuts expire. That government would reap $365 billion over the next decade.

— Limit the itemized tax deductions high earners can claim for charitable donations, mortgage interest and state and local taxes, raising about $210 billion for the next decade.

— Increase the top capital gains tax rate from 15 percent to 20 percent for families making more than $250,000 a year and individuals making more than $200,000. The proposal would raise about $105 billion.

— Make the research and experimentation tax credit permanent, saving businesses about $83 billion over the next decade.

— Extend a provision allowing businesses buying equipment such as computers to speed up depreciation through 2010, saving them $20 billion over the next decade.

— Eliminate capital gains taxes on the sale of some small business stocks, as long as they are held for at least five years, saving taxpayers $8 billion over the next decade.

— Impose a "financial crisis responsibility fee" on large financial institutions, raising $90 billion over the next decade.

— Repeal a widely ignored law that taxes the personal use of company-issued cell phones like other fringe benefits, saving taxpayers $2.8 billion over 10 years.

— Restrict the ability of international companies to defer taxes on profits made overseas, raising about $26 billion over the next decade.

— Impose a total of about $39 billion in tax increases on oil, gas and coal companies over the next decade.

— Change the way profits made by investment fund managers are taxed, raising an additional $24 billion over the next decade.

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100201/..._backdoortaxes

Middle-class families also will find fewer tax breaks available to them in 2010 if other popular tax provisions are allowed to expire. Among them:

* Taxpayers who itemize will lose the option to deduct state sales-tax payments instead of state and local income taxes;

* The $250 teacher tax credit for classroom supplies;

* The tax deduction for up to $4,000 of college tuition and expenses;

* Individuals who don't itemize will no longer be able to increase their standard deduction by up to $1,000 for property taxes paid;

* The first $2,400 of unemployment benefits are taxable, in 2009 that amount was tax-free

Originally Posted by BFT3K

For the morons who still believe in trickle down economics...

http://investment-blog.net/the-top-t...1950-and-1982/

Originally Posted by The Demon

The only moron is the one posting something he has no real understanding of (you, in case that went over your head).

And TheDoc, there's a reason why people ignore your posts.

Originally Posted by The Demon

And TheDoc, there's a reason why people ignore your posts.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Yes, I know... the reason is simple, you started trolling.

Originally Posted by The Demon

AHhhhh.. Denial at its finest Too easy.

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Another retarded retort, from a retarded revisionist!

Originally Posted by TheDoc

You are a troll, I'm not denying that.

Originally Posted by The Demon

It WOULD be a retarded retort, if your stupid ass knew what "trickled down economics" meant, instead of reading the terms somewhere and posting them here, hoping people will think you're intelligent (I've never seen anyone on this forum giving you the benefit of the doubt). Carry on

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Is it true your parents were brother and sister?

Originally Posted by The Demon

Guess you're not denying being the forum clown either

Originally Posted by The Demon

Is it true that you couldn't pass the first grade because you were borderline retarded?

Originally Posted by TheDoc

I will be the forum clown... it's fun clowning you, I don't deny that.

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Did your parents have any intelligent kids as well?

Originally Posted by The Demon

The forum clown(you), is usually the one who gets his ass handed to him by more intelligent individuals, IE: me, everybody other than BFT3k. It's so easy kicking your ass, it's almost a daily routine.

Originally Posted by The Demon

That's a weird question to be asking, especially as a response to my insult. Your question assumes my parents are intelligent, which is why you're wondering if they had intelligent kids. Why thank you BFT3k I hope that didn't confuse you.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

I agree... you pawn me, own me, you do things to me no other girl has ever done, like that little thing with your tongue...

Now could you please actually post something of substance other than more spew?

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Somewhere a village is missing its idiot. Why don't you find your way there and apply for the job?

Originally Posted by The Demon

Because you're a lifetime employee of that job title, so I wouldn't have much luck. Thanks though.

Originally Posted by The Demon

There's nothing of substance that can be posted when typing to you. Talking to a brick wall doesn't require substance. Carry on.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Unlike your stupid ass.... people here are trying to discuss a topic.

Originally Posted by GatorB

Never should have passed those tax cuts anyways. One reason why we have such a huge deficit. Honeslty I'm not feeling sorry that someone making $200K will have to pay MAYBE $10,000 more in taxes IF that.

Originally Posted by Rangermoore

What kind of moron would want to pay $99,000 on $250,000 income? That would leave $151,000 of the money that was earned.. So I guess $250,000 is the "new" rich..It's obvious the only morons that are for a tax rate of 39.6% are people that do not earn $250,000 or more...

Originally Posted by The Demon

Correction* People are here to discuss a topic, without your interference. Try again

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Try again? Idiot, I created the thread... as a reminder, you are the troll in my thread.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Even at 40%, other than the small drop it just had under Bush, this is the lowest point taxes have ever been in History - EVER!

If you want to live in a safe nation, drive on nice roads, safe bridges, and all the other shit we do, you pay for it or you can go live in a 3rd world shit hole with low/no taxes.

Originally Posted by Rangermoore

I would be in favor of a flat tax rate..

Originally Posted by The Demon

You created the thread, and people STILL ignore you. How sad is that?

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Yes, I know... the reason is simple, you started trolling.

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Why would you lie over something so lame? It just sounds lame..you sound pathetic... but keep trolling.

Originally Posted by The Demon

The captain of bullshit is still rambling. Hilarious

Originally Posted by TheDoc

True... but at least I'm not a troll.

Originally Posted by The Demon

Of course you are. You're the very definition of a troll. The fact that your insecurities allow you to deny the obvious, is sad.

When you post in threads using pure bullshit to the point where people call you out, kick your ass, and then watch you talk shit like a little kid, up until they just flat out ignore you, that kinda makes you a troll.

Yet another concept that flew way over your head

Originally Posted by TheDoc

Except, people call you a troll all the time.... In 3 different threads today, 3 different people called you a troll, today alone!

Hell you have had an entire 'troll' thread dedicated to you, that's sad....

That's really sad....

Originally Posted by The Demon

Awww really? Now who's the liar? Doesn't it make you feel bad knowing that you project your faults on other people, and then you get called out for it? I've been called a troll by 3 different people, and more than 3 people call you a moron everytime we argue What do you think is sadder, captain bullshit?

Originally Posted by The Demon

It's calling calling you out on your lies, which more than enough people have done already. Don't you get tired of being the joke of this forum? Time for a new hobby=>