Dirty D Plans to Surrender to Fla..... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

baddog · 03-12-2010, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena

I wanted to clarify that my comments were not directed at you, Jenni. Outside of seeing you post on gfy, I don't know anything about you, or your company.

But I personally fail to see how *any* comments to the press are beneficial to DirtyD. In this thread, we have Shelly, a resident of that area, telling us that, thus far, the case is pretty much under the radar. What on earth could be gained by someone (you or the attorney, not sure who is giving the press conference) in essence, jumping up and down, waving their arms, screaming at the mainstream media

"Lookee, lookee, lookee!!! My client has been charged with a crime that has the words "child" and "sex" in it!"

WTF?

On GFY, we may sit here and debate whether it matters if she was 17 and not 18, what her culpability is for using a fake id, etc, etc. But mainstream America isn't going to quibble over those points. They are going to hear "porn" and "underage" and that will be the ballgame, ladies and gents. Sure, there will be some that will actually wait until the facts are heard, but they are not in the majority.

And while stuff that has happened in his past may not be relevant and allowed in court, the media...and with all due respect to XBiz, I mean the mainstream media...will have a field day with stuff like getting a blowjob from another guy in a public theater during a porn movie.

No matter what the Court finds, DirtyD will be found guilty by public opinion about two paragraphs into a press conference.

A press conference? For real?

Seems like an attorney who wants to make a name for himself to me.

To me, the only comment that should be uttered by anyone involved with the defense, or the defendant should be along the lines of

"We are confident that after the Court/jury hears our case that Mr. Whateverhisnameis will be found innocent on all charges. No further comment."

Then again, I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.

VikingMan · 03-12-2010, 08:43 AM

He seriously cannot afford a better attorney????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kristin · 03-12-2010, 08:49 AM

I like that the articles use their handle names.

Quagmire · 03-12-2010, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin

I like that the articles use their handle names.

will76 · 03-12-2010, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JenniDahling

It is actually the attorney who contacted me yesterday giving me the date and requesting I contact our industry press and they will help organize the mainstream.

Why would you have a press statement? The majority of the media doesn't know about this and the vast majority of the public doesn't know. Why have press conference to let everyone know that some pornography who makes money off of exploiting crack whores and from gloryholes has been accused of shooting an underage girl. By the time the media gets finished with what you say at the press release, what will be written will sound something like this " Local smut peddler who made millions off of crack whores and lewd sex acts will be arrested for shooting a minor". That's what the public will hear, not your "press conference" but the media's reprint of what they take from it and what will sell papers. (Which wont make your client look good).

So what is the point of having a press conference ?

Not to mention like it was stated here, what is said could also be used against him.

not smart, I don't see the benefit of doing this, to proclaim your innocence to the public who doesn't know about your problems in the first place ?

LadyMischief · 03-12-2010, 08:57 AM

My question in all this is, what about the other companies that supposedly shot this girl? Do they know? Were they informed? Are they going to be expecting police raids? If D is going down for a girl using a fake ID, what about the other people that got suckered with said fake ID? Are industry folks supposed to be experts in spotting false identification? I thought there had been other precidents where this kind of thing was involved?

Just honestly curious.

LoveSandra · 03-12-2010, 08:57 AM

oh yeah ...

JenniDahling · 03-12-2010, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief

My question in all this is, what about the other companies that supposedly shot this girl? Do they know? Were they informed? Are they going to be expecting police raids? If D is going down for a girl using a fake ID, what about the other people that got suckered with said fake ID? Are industry folks supposed to be experts in spotting false identification? I thought there had been other precidents where this kind of thing was involved?

Just honestly curious.

That indeed is a good question, it's just hard to figure out chronology unless those companies are aware and check their logs as well. It happened in 2008.

pornlaw · 03-12-2010, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JenniDahling

I will not be speaking at this press conference, the attorneys will be speaking.

My comments were not aimed it you alone. When you have a criminal defendant you proclaim innocence and move on --

"I am confident my client will be cleared of all charges he/she is currently accused of and his/her innocence will be vindicated. Thank you."

Anything beyond that and it gets risky.

Press Release Pro · 03-12-2010, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76

Why would you have a press statement? The majority of the media doesn't know about this and the vast majority of the public doesn't know. Why have press conference to let everyone know that some pornography who makes money off of exploiting crack whores and from gloryholes has been accused of shooting an underage girl. By the time the media gets finished with what you say at the press release, what will be written will sound something like this " Local smut peddler who made millions off of crack whores and lewd sex acts will be arrested for shooting a minor". That's what the public will hear, not your "press conference" but the media's reprint of what they take from it and what will sell papers. (Which wont make your client look good).

So what is the point of having a press conference ?

Not to mention like it was stated here, what is said could also be used against him.

not smart, I don't see the benefit of doing this, to proclaim your innocence to the public who doesn't know about your problems in the first place ?

Interesting; You would almost think there is something bigger on the agenda

Tjeezers · 03-12-2010, 09:18 AM

This keeps on getting dumber and dumber.
What ever people do to get their name in XBiZ, it is amazing.....

BradM · 03-12-2010, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin

I like that the articles use their handle names.

funny I was just going to post the same thing
we're true professionals in porn.

Tjeezers · 03-12-2010, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Press Release Pro

Interesting; You would almost think there is something bigger on the agenda

spot on...

stickyfingerz · 03-12-2010, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

Sticky supposedly has that person's info and won't post it, because posting an adult's name who's not a member here anymore would get him banned he thinks.

And yea, anyone who would have anybody but their attorney talking for them in a case like this is asking to be reamed in court.

See the person in question blew their load on me already. Came out guns blaring. I tend to hold onto my info and use it when it would be most effective. I've given several hints to people so far that should make it fairly easy to pin down who fmltube is.

fl_prn_str · 03-12-2010, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LadyMischief

My question in all this is, what about the other companies that supposedly shot this girl? Do they know? Were they informed? Are they going to be expecting police raids? If D is going down for a girl using a fake ID, what about the other people that got suckered with said fake ID? Are industry folks supposed to be experts in spotting false identification? I thought there had been other precidents where this kind of thing was involved?

Just honestly curious.

Their lies the question within a question. Was the Defendant the only shooter to produce adult content of this nature? Was she exaggerating her resume or body of work or did all the other shooters just do simple “softcore” stuff with her before her 18th? Naturally will definitely never know the real truth until it plays out in court. No one knows the game plan except for the players involved….maybe the whole “press conference” idea is just a way to claim for a change of venue…..if the local media pool has tainted the local general publics idea of the case and they can prove without a shadow of a doubt that he will not get a fair and unbiased jury pool…..its not written in stone merely just another angle.

Quentin · 03-12-2010, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

My comments were not aimed it you alone. When you have a criminal defendant you proclaim innocence and move on --

"I am confident my client will be cleared of all charges he/she is currently accused of and his/her innocence will be vindicated. Thank you."

Anything beyond that and it gets risky.

In addition to the words of wisdom Michael has already posted, let me just add this: if any of you are ever in a circumstance in which, after shooting a model and distributing content depicting that model, you have reason to believe that the model in question provided you with a fake ID and/or might have been underage at the time of filming, that is the moment to make first contact with your attorney about the issue.

In that situation, before you do ANYTHING else, call your attorney, tell them anything and everything you know about the situation, and then ask "what should I do?"

Do NOT discuss the matter with anybody else, and do NOT discuss it with any manner of media outlet, in particular.

It's always better to give your attorney a chance to deal with things before they become a publicly known clusterfuck of the "he said/she said" variety, regardless of whether it is a criminal or civil matter, but it is all the more important when there's potential for serious criminal liability.

TheAmericanCannibal · 03-12-2010, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikki_Licks

Good advice!

My Pop and Uncle always drilled it into my head to never, never say a word to the authorities, no matter how small the offense. To this day I will never speak to authorities no matter what, no even my name.

The only thing that should come out of your mouth is to ask for your phone call, call your attorney and keep your mouth shut

Always remember " The only time whales get harpooned, are when they come up to SPOUT"

ShellyCrash · 03-12-2010, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JenniDahling

That indeed is a good question, it's just hard to figure out chronology unless those companies are aware and check their logs as well. It happened in 2008.

I don't know what the DOB on the performer is, but according to the warrant the offense occured in Nov 07.

seeric · 03-12-2010, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Oh no... never talk to the press. Every statement can and will be used against you - even if its not the defendant saying it.

I never give statements on the behalf of my clients even in civil cases. Its not my case to comment on.

In a criminal matter you never say anything. Unless you are a well known high profile criminal defense attorney that has certain reporters in your pocket that you know will get out your story in the exact way you want it out there - basically the guys that will let you write your own statement and will not twist it.

Otherwise it is a huge risk to take.

Good-luck with his defense though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

In addition to the words of wisdom Michael has already posted, let me just add this: if any of you are ever in a circumstance in which, after shooting a model and distributing content depicting that model, you have reason to believe that the model in question provided you with a fake ID and/or might have been underage at the time of filming, that is the moment to make first contact with your attorney about the issue.

In that situation, before you do ANYTHING else, call your attorney, tell them anything and everything you know about the situation, and then ask "what should I do?"

Do NOT discuss the matter with anybody else, and do NOT discuss it with any manner of media outlet, in particular.

It's always better to give your attorney a chance to deal with things before they become a publicly known clusterfuck of the "he said/she said" variety, regardless of whether it is a criminal or civil matter, but it is all the more important when there's potential for serious criminal liability.

As a former lawman, I salute you!

and

No offense to any one involved, but this thing is one hell of a train wreck already.

Being handled so badly IMHO.

Barefootsies · 03-12-2010, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quagmire

dyna mo · 03-12-2010, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin

I like that the articles use their handle names.

would be funny if they do the same in the press conference.

SmokeyTheBear · 03-12-2010, 10:29 AM

if you guys remember joe francis faced similar charges, he did make public comments and he did get most of the charges thrown out. Mind you he had a ton more money likely to back himself.

_Richard_ · 03-12-2010, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by selena

I wanted to clarify that my comments were not directed at you, Jenni. Outside of seeing you post on gfy, I don't know anything about you, or your company.

But I personally fail to see how *any* comments to the press are beneficial to DirtyD. In this thread, we have Shelly, a resident of that area, telling us that, thus far, the case is pretty much under the radar. What on earth could be gained by someone (you or the attorney, not sure who is giving the press conference) in essence, jumping up and down, waving their arms, screaming at the mainstream media

"Lookee, lookee, lookee!!! My client has been charged with a crime that has the words "child" and "sex" in it!"

WTF?

On GFY, we may sit here and debate whether it matters if she was 17 and not 18, what her culpability is for using a fake id, etc, etc. But mainstream America isn't going to quibble over those points. They are going to hear "porn" and "underage" and that will be the ballgame, ladies and gents. Sure, there will be some that will actually wait until the facts are heard, but they are not in the majority.

And while stuff that has happened in his past may not be relevant and allowed in court, the media...and with all due respect to XBiz, I mean the mainstream media...will have a field day with stuff like getting a blowjob from another guy in a public theater during a porn movie.

No matter what the Court finds, DirtyD will be found guilty by public opinion about two paragraphs into a press conference.

A press conference? For real?

Seems like an attorney who wants to make a name for himself to me.

To me, the only comment that should be uttered by anyone involved with the defense, or the defendant should be along the lines of

"We are confident that after the Court/jury hears our case that Mr. Whateverhisnameis will be found innocent on all charges. No further comment."

Then again, I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.

Tjeezers · 03-12-2010, 04:04 PM

And this is nothing yet

TyroneGoldberg · 03-12-2010, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin

I like that the articles use their handle names.

lmao

im thinking the same. not to make light of his situation, but using screen names is funny..

oh inb4 next train wreck pic

Quagmire · 03-12-2010, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

The sad part of it is the 'news' outlets in adult want to be taken seriously, but can't even bother (or have the balls to) to refer to the person as "William Bidermann Sr AKA WillyPissPump on the boards" but just call them by their completely random board name.

It would be like CNN having some hot news story about a guy and referring to him as Captain Crunch because he used that name to pass a phony check back in 1993...

BigDeanEvans · 03-12-2010, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

In addition to the words of wisdom Michael has already posted, let me just add this: if any of you are ever in a circumstance in which, after shooting a model and distributing content depicting that model, you have reason to believe that the model in question provided you with a fake ID and/or might have been underage at the time of filming, that is the moment to make first contact with your attorney about the issue.

In that situation, before you do ANYTHING else, call your attorney, tell them anything and everything you know about the situation, and then ask "what should I do?"

Do NOT discuss the matter with anybody else, and do NOT discuss it with any manner of media outlet, in particular.

It's always better to give your attorney a chance to deal with things before they become a publicly known clusterfuck of the "he said/she said" variety, regardless of whether it is a criminal or civil matter, but it is all the more important when there's potential for serious criminal liability.

Yes, because removing said content you could be charged with obstruction of justice. Best to not touch it and contact an attorney

epitome · 03-12-2010, 10:53 PM

I'm imagining D thinks this is something similar to when he got busted getting a blowjob from a dude in a porn theater ... that he'll get slapped with something minor and spin it into looking like he's a hardcore pervert that lives up to the name Dirty D.

I simply fail to see that happening here.

This cannot be spun into a marketing event.

I wonder if he's bought howilostitall.com just in case.

BVF · 03-13-2010, 12:16 AM

I still don't believe that he's coming back at all.....I mean his shit has already been seized so there's nothing left to come back to.....He can choose to stay out of the country and still pay his affiliates and make money, or come back to Tampa and get crucified and basically convicted of child porn, which means that his sweet white ass will be grass in prison...Plus he will be left with nothing no matter whether he wins or loses the case, at which time, he will be forced to look for a job at Wendy's.

I mean, I have children and all but I'm not sure that I would come back...Hell, he could just hang out in Mexico if he was willing to lay low....Then he could fly his family in...

I would stay put if I was him and that's what I believe will happen.

k0nr4d · 03-13-2010, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BVF

I still don't believe that he's coming back at all.....I mean his shit has already been seized so there's nothing left to come back to.....He can choose to stay out of the country and still pay his affiliates and make money, or come back to Tampa and get crucified and basically convicted of child porn, which means that his sweet white ass will be grass in prison...Plus he will be left with nothing no matter whether he wins or loses the case, at which time, he will be forced to look for a job at Wendy's.

I mean, I have children and all but I'm not sure that I would come back...Hell, he could just hang out in Mexico if he was willing to lay low....Then he could fly his family in...

I would stay put if I was him and that's what I believe will happen.

Agreed. It sounds like he is just as fucked if he wins as if he losses. Best to stay put, although im sure they have frozen bank accounts and such.

will76 · 03-13-2010, 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

In addition to the words of wisdom Michael has already posted, let me just add this: if any of you are ever in a circumstance in which, after shooting a model and distributing content depicting that model, you have reason to believe that the model in question provided you with a fake ID and/or might have been underage at the time of filming, that is the moment to make first contact with your attorney about the issue.

In that situation, before you do ANYTHING else, call your attorney, tell them anything and everything you know about the situation, and then ask "what should I do?"

Do NOT discuss the matter with anybody else, and do NOT discuss it with any manner of media outlet, in particular.

It's always better to give your attorney a chance to deal with things before they become a publicly known clusterfuck of the "he said/she said" variety, regardless of whether it is a criminal or civil matter, but it is all the more important when there's potential for serious criminal liability.

(If the attorney advises this or not I don't know) BUt it also seems like the prudent thing to do as soon as you remove the content, and contact all of your affiliates, would be to contact the authorities and let them know what happened. If you are proactive and walk into the police station, explain to them that this girl is using a fake id to do porn, that you found out, removed the content, and wanted to make a report.

I highly doubt that he would be in the mess he is in now if he took that approach .

Quote:

Originally Posted by k0nr4d

Agreed. It sounds like he is just as fucked if he wins as if he losses. Best to stay put, although im sure they have frozen bank accounts and such.

if they froze the bank accounts, how are affiliates being paid ?

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 03-13-2010, 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quagmire

03-12-2010, 08:49 AM	#53
kristin GOO! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Back Home : ) Posts: 9,768	I like that the articles use their handle names. __________________ Vacares rules. "Usually only fat guys have the kind of knowledge and ability that Kristin has."

03-12-2010, 08:57 AM	#56
LadyMischief Orgasms N Such! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Oakville, Ontario Posts: 18,135	My question in all this is, what about the other companies that supposedly shot this girl? Do they know? Were they informed? Are they going to be expecting police raids? If D is going down for a girl using a fake ID, what about the other people that got suckered with said fake ID? Are industry folks supposed to be experts in spotting false identification? I thought there had been other precidents where this kind of thing was involved? Just honestly curious. __________________ ICQ 3522039 Content Manager - orgasm.com [email protected]

03-12-2010, 09:18 AM	#61
Tjeezers Webmaster Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: BP4L - NL/RO Posts: 16,447	This keeps on getting dumber and dumber. What ever people do to get their name in XBiZ, it is amazing..... __________________ Enroll in the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program and receive a minimum of 2 bonus backlinks by placing your Affiliate Link on your website. The higher your link's position, the more bonus backlinks you'll receive. Request your bonus links here upon signing up.

03-12-2010, 10:29 AM	#72
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	if you guys remember joe francis faced similar charges, he did make public comments and he did get most of the charges thrown out. Mind you he had a ton more money likely to back himself. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

03-12-2010, 04:04 PM	#74
Tjeezers Webmaster Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: BP4L - NL/RO Posts: 16,447	And this is nothing yet __________________ Enroll in the SWAG Affiliate Asian Live Cam Program and receive a minimum of 2 bonus backlinks by placing your Affiliate Link on your website. The higher your link's position, the more bonus backlinks you'll receive. Request your bonus links here upon signing up.

03-12-2010, 08:43 AM	#52
VikingMan Exploiting human weakness Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: next to a salmon stream Posts: 6,342	He seriously cannot afford a better attorney????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

03-12-2010, 08:57 AM	#57
LoveSandra So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Just Blow Me Posts: 10,551	oh yeah ...

03-12-2010, 10:53 PM	#78
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,160	I'm imagining D thinks this is something similar to when he got busted getting a blowjob from a dude in a porn theater ... that he'll get slapped with something minor and spin it into looking like he's a hardcore pervert that lives up to the name Dirty D. I simply fail to see that happening here. This cannot be spun into a marketing event. I wonder if he's bought howilostitall.com just in case.

03-13-2010, 12:16 AM	#79
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,976	I still don't believe that he's coming back at all.....I mean his shit has already been seized so there's nothing left to come back to.....He can choose to stay out of the country and still pay his affiliates and make money, or come back to Tampa and get crucified and basically convicted of child porn, which means that his sweet white ass will be grass in prison...Plus he will be left with nothing no matter whether he wins or loses the case, at which time, he will be forced to look for a job at Wendy's. I mean, I have children and all but I'm not sure that I would come back...Hell, he could just hang out in Mexico if he was willing to lay low....Then he could fly his family in... I would stay put if I was him and that's what I believe will happen. __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!