New Mandatory Condoms in Porn - New Law (California) - GoFuckYourself.com

JayAllan · 03-09-2010, 06:32 PM

Just saw this on MSNBC.

Not yet passed but could be on Thursday...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35782713

If this passes I think it will drive most shooting to Vegas or elsewhere.

mmcfadden · 03-09-2010, 07:01 PM

I will be the first to say that it will not pass

Bman · 03-09-2010, 07:01 PM

Probably be a good thing moving it to another state where people have a better sense of reality

xNetworx · 03-09-2010, 08:28 PM

It won't pass

marketsmart · 03-09-2010, 08:33 PM

been tried before i believe...

if they want to keep america safe from hiv/aids then they should require congress to wear condoms for all the ass fucking they do....

and priests too, they also do a lot of ass fucking....

.

bronco67 · 03-09-2010, 09:22 PM

So are they trying to protect the general public, or porn stars?

What's safer? Fucking by people who have had AIDS tests, or random drunk hookups in any random city in the US? The logic is baffling.

BFT3K · 03-09-2010, 09:24 PM

Sounds like a good new niche!...

babymaker · 03-09-2010, 09:26 PM

Hope it doesn't pass.

amateurcanada · 03-09-2010, 09:40 PM

If it passes I hope it includes a grandfather clause to ensure all previous productions are ok. Lets talk from a political standpoint, maybe the gov't wants to pass on the responsibility of exhibiting safe sex to people to control diseases etc. In theory we should agree as its a good idea, however in mainstream movies drugs, alcohol and booze are prominent so why do we need to take a hit in this regard. If they pass such a rule its yet another hit to your freedom of speach. Not cool.

Monique Niccole · 03-09-2010, 10:17 PM

It won't pass, but if it did, I'd expect a mass exodus of shooters out of California and scenes being bought or shot elsewhere.

It's a very slippery slope from regulating on-camera sex in the name of occupational safety to regulating off-camera sex in the name of public health safety.

ShellyCrash · 03-09-2010, 10:25 PM

Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass.

Doesn't help my mind from racing about where the lines would be drawn.

CruelMedia · 03-10-2010, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass.

my thought also..

pornlaw · 03-10-2010, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass.

Doesn't help my mind from racing about where the lines would be drawn.

This has been tried before and it has failed. For years I have lobbyed with the FSC in Sacramento and can tell you that in past years the legislature has been very open and friendly to the industry and as often received support from certain members.

However the two issues that most concerned legislators and staff members were health care for the industry and treating the performers better. They understand that if drive the industry out of California the state will suffer.

But there is a breaking point. Are we there yet... no one knows.

Here's the problem though, its not legal to film in any other state besides New Hampshire and the industry wont move there. And Florida is not adult friendly as we have seen in several cases now. Nevada might be an option but even the brothels have stringent restrictions on them and some might soon be fading into the desert as the counties they are in continue to grow.

kmanrox · 03-10-2010, 08:46 AM

hahaa that would single handedly cancel the porn content industry from that state.. smooth

dyna mo · 03-10-2010, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayAllan

Just saw this on MSNBC.

Not yet passed but could be on Thursday...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35782713

If this passes I think it will drive most shooting to Vegas or elsewhere.

there's no article there and i couldn't find the one you were referring. :-(

NaughtyRob · 03-10-2010, 11:09 AM

It won't pass but if it did Vegas would be the obvious choice for shooting.

96ukssob · 03-10-2010, 11:10 AM

wont pass IMO. CA has to much to loose if these businesses go to another state.

media · 03-10-2010, 11:15 AM

Catholics dont believe in using condoms, so how could a condom be forced to be used on a catholic girl? I understand she's shooting porn, but maybe contraceptives are something she's not willing to budge on.. just shooting something out there in light of god vs state.. but I really doubt this will pass anyways..

JP-pornshooter · 03-10-2010, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by media

Catholics dont believe in using condoms, so how could a condom be forced to be used on a catholic girl? I understand she's shooting porn, but maybe contraceptives are something she's not willing to budge on.. just shooting something out there in light of god vs state.. but I really doubt this will pass anyways..

yeah and free speech too..

as Michael mention, shooting porn is not considered legal in states other than CA and NH.
Vegas would be where the industry would go, some perhaps even to Phoenix where there is already a decent amount of shooting going on.
But both those locations are not legal, shooting porn would by the eyes of the law considered as a form of prostitution..

Quagmire · 03-10-2010, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass.

Doesn't help my mind from racing about where the lines would be drawn.

This is exactly whatIi was thinking. They're already bailing out a battle ship with a dixie cup, they can't afford to lose more legit businesses.

F-U-Jimmy · 03-10-2010, 05:55 PM

OK here's the deal and this is no joke !
Purely by coincidence i am moving to New Hampshire this summer ( the only other state in the USA where its legal to shoot porn)
I was going to retire and sell off my porn content / program etc and concentrate on my ceramic business.
But if this shit happens and condoms are made mandatory i would be happy to shoot for a very select number of programs
Just throwing it out there in case anyones interested ?

JayAllan · 03-11-2010, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

there's no article there and i couldn't find the one you were referring. :-(

Its there.

NickB. · 03-11-2010, 02:22 AM

I wonder if you shoot married couples - than what ? they need to wrap it as well?

Zorgman · 03-11-2010, 02:24 AM

How would a facial or blowjobs work then? With a condom too?

03-11-2010, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass.

Doesn't help my mind from racing about where the lines would be drawn.

good point!
They always do whats good for the economy and if theres constant money flowing through, money talks!

PXN · 03-11-2010, 03:21 AM

It won't pass. It very easy to bride a bunch of lawmakers in Calif with sex. Offer them a BJ for a vote to turn down that bill is all it take.

The Duck · 03-11-2010, 05:06 AM

Incredibly stupid.

pornguy · 03-11-2010, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by media

Catholics dont believe in using condoms, so how could a condom be forced to be used on a catholic girl? I understand she's shooting porn, but maybe contraceptives are something she's not willing to budge on.. just shooting something out there in light of god vs state.. but I really doubt this will pass anyways..

Something to remember if it does pass.

Serial Pervert · 03-11-2010, 07:04 AM

i think it's interesting.

Gonzo Modeling · 03-11-2010, 07:14 AM

PHX, AZ will soon be the new porn city

JP-pornshooter · 03-18-2010, 12:42 PM

this is up for vote today, any word yet?

hypedough · 03-18-2010, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickB. - Triplexcash

I wonder if you shoot married couples - than what ? they need to wrap it as well?

I honestly don't think so. Had the same question but doubt we'll get an answer from one of the lawmakers.

JP-pornshooter · 03-18-2010, 01:56 PM

so it was voted to "further study a proposal that would require porn actors to wear condoms during sex scenes."
so for now nothing has changed..

full article:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=124807532

JayAllan · 03-18-2010, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter

so it was voted to "further study a proposal that would require porn actors to wear condoms during sex scenes."
so for now nothing has changed..

full article:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=124807532

Good to hear. Thanks for the followup

aniloscash · 03-18-2010, 03:24 PM

pandering not legal in vegas only cali

seeric · 03-18-2010, 03:28 PM

imho california cant afford to lose one tax dollar.

BobG · 03-18-2010, 03:59 PM

"explore" = it's gonna happen.

JP-pornshooter · 03-18-2010, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric

imho california cant afford to lose one tax dollar.

yesterday they fired a good percentage of the court system (los angeles county)
this recession is by far over yet..
that being said they also squandered money away when the property taxes flourished..

pornlaw · 03-18-2010, 06:21 PM

Well it passed...meaning there will be an advisory committee made of industry peeps and experts in employee safety.

It will probably take 2 yrs for any real change to come about -- if there really is a change to enforce condoms on set in California.

I highly doubt it though. This measure has little to no support from the legislature in California since everyone knows we cannot afford to lose a single tax dollar.

I see other things coming from this though -- work comp insurance for all production companies in California. That actually puts money into the state coffers....

03-09-2010, 06:32 PM	#1
JayAllan So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Santa Barbara, CA Posts: 1,148	New Mandatory Condoms in Porn - New Law (California) Just saw this on MSNBC. Not yet passed but could be on Thursday... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35782713 If this passes I think it will drive most shooting to Vegas or elsewhere.

03-09-2010, 07:01 PM	#3
Bman Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Redirecting your traffic Posts: 1,679	Probably be a good thing moving it to another state where people have a better sense of reality __________________ ICQ 228211529

03-09-2010, 09:22 PM	#6
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	So are they trying to protect the general public, or porn stars? What's safer? Fucking by people who have had AIDS tests, or random drunk hookups in any random city in the US? The logic is baffling. __________________

03-09-2010, 09:26 PM	#8
babymaker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: philly Posts: 4,751	Hope it doesn't pass. __________________ $99mo Hosted CMS From ElevatedX! ICQ 293125596

03-09-2010, 09:40 PM	#9
amateurcanada Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,766	If it passes I hope it includes a grandfather clause to ensure all previous productions are ok. Lets talk from a political standpoint, maybe the gov't wants to pass on the responsibility of exhibiting safe sex to people to control diseases etc. In theory we should agree as its a good idea, however in mainstream movies drugs, alcohol and booze are prominent so why do we need to take a hit in this regard. If they pass such a rule its yet another hit to your freedom of speach. Not cool. __________________ be our partner - join nichepartners today will.assum.producer @ AmateurCanada.com / icq: 30146166 / facebook.com/will.assum / #amateurcanada

03-09-2010, 07:01 PM	#2
mmcfadden So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: philly Posts: 5,099	I will be the first to say that it will not pass

03-09-2010, 08:28 PM	#4
xNetworx So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Whore Island Posts: 14,445	It won't pass

03-09-2010, 08:33 PM	#5
marketsmart HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane Posts: 20,419	been tried before i believe... if they want to keep america safe from hiv/aids then they should require congress to wear condoms for all the ass fucking they do.... and priests too, they also do a lot of ass fucking.... .

03-09-2010, 09:24 PM	#7
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	Sounds like a good new niche!...

03-09-2010, 10:17 PM	#10
Monique Niccole Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: San Francisco Posts: 5,653	It won't pass, but if it did, I'd expect a mass exodus of shooters out of California and scenes being bought or shot elsewhere. It's a very slippery slope from regulating on-camera sex in the name of occupational safety to regulating off-camera sex in the name of public health safety. Last edited by Monique Niccole; 03-09-2010 at 10:20 PM..

03-09-2010, 10:25 PM	#11
ShellyCrash Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Posts: 6,708	Too much $$ flows through porn valley. CA can't afford to lose any of it right now. Based on that I think it will not pass. Doesn't help my mind from racing about where the lines would be drawn. __________________ Start making money with the hottest hookup site! up to $55 PPS or up to 75% Revshare ICQ 196766477

03-10-2010, 08:46 AM	#14
kmanrox aka K-Man Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Gutter Posts: 29,292	hahaa that would single handedly cancel the porn content industry from that state.. smooth __________________ Crypto HODLr Crypto mining Angel investor

03-10-2010, 11:09 AM	#16
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	It won't pass but if it did Vegas would be the obvious choice for shooting. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

03-10-2010, 11:10 AM	#17
96ukssob So Fucking Banananananas Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it Posts: 12,991	wont pass IMO. CA has to much to loose if these businesses go to another state. __________________ Email: Clicky on Me

03-10-2010, 11:15 AM	#18
media Confirmed Moneymaker Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Eugene, OR It's Like Jail, Only with Trees! Posts: 9,852	Catholics dont believe in using condoms, so how could a condom be forced to be used on a catholic girl? I understand she's shooting porn, but maybe contraceptives are something she's not willing to budge on.. just shooting something out there in light of god vs state.. but I really doubt this will pass anyways.. __________________ I'm here for the violence!

03-10-2010, 05:55 PM	#21
F-U-Jimmy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Visiting a city near you soon ! Posts: 6,853	OK here's the deal and this is no joke ! Purely by coincidence i am moving to New Hampshire this summer ( the only other state in the USA where its legal to shoot porn) I was going to retire and sell off my porn content / program etc and concentrate on my ceramic business. But if this shit happens and condoms are made mandatory i would be happy to shoot for a very select number of programs Just throwing it out there in case anyones interested ? __________________ icq. 176240424 44.years as a pornographer !!!!!!!!!!!

03-11-2010, 02:22 AM	#23
NickB. Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 8,855	I wonder if you shoot married couples - than what ? they need to wrap it as well?

03-11-2010, 02:24 AM	#24
Zorgman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 6,103	How would a facial or blowjobs work then? With a condom too? __________________ ---

03-11-2010, 03:21 AM	#26
PXN Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 1,548	It won't pass. It very easy to bride a bunch of lawmakers in Calif with sex. Offer them a BJ for a vote to turn down that bill is all it take.

03-11-2010, 05:06 AM	#27
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	Incredibly stupid. __________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

03-11-2010, 07:04 AM	#29
Serial Pervert Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,666	i think it's interesting. __________________

03-11-2010, 07:14 AM	#30
Gonzo Modeling So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Arizona Posts: 465	PHX, AZ will soon be the new porn city

03-18-2010, 12:42 PM	#31
JP-pornshooter Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: westcoast usa Posts: 4,007	this is up for vote today, any word yet? __________________ "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown

03-18-2010, 01:56 PM	#33
JP-pornshooter Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: westcoast usa Posts: 4,007	so it was voted to "further study a proposal that would require porn actors to wear condoms during sex scenes." so for now nothing has changed.. full article: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=124807532 __________________ "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown

03-18-2010, 03:24 PM	#35
aniloscash Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,161	pandering not legal in vegas only cali __________________ Got Milf Traffic Contact Me ICQ 473236446 j (at)anilos (dot)com http://www.aniloscash.com

03-18-2010, 03:28 PM	#36
seeric .......... Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: .......... Posts: 41,917	imho california cant afford to lose one tax dollar.

03-18-2010, 03:59 PM	#37
BobG Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: San Diego Posts: 4,274	"explore" = it's gonna happen.

03-18-2010, 06:21 PM	#39
pornlaw Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,877	Well it passed...meaning there will be an advisory committee made of industry peeps and experts in employee safety. It will probably take 2 yrs for any real change to come about -- if there really is a change to enforce condoms on set in California. I highly doubt it though. This measure has little to no support from the legislature in California since everyone knows we cannot afford to lose a single tax dollar. I see other things coming from this though -- work comp insurance for all production companies in California. That actually puts money into the state coffers.... __________________ Michael www.AdultBizLaw.com