One only has to look through history, labs being burned down, scientists murdered etc. Then we look at Brzezinski's award winning documentary, where they try to throw him in prison. This is not about belief this is fact. :2 cents:

:thumbsup:thumbsup:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yes, in his little fantasy world people get murdered all the time for knowing the truth. As always he won't be able to back this up though but that doesn't seem to bother him one bit.

You're not thinking clearly, they already are making serious money from Cancer, they make over $2000 per month per Cancer patient. They wouldn't if they gave them a non-patentable cure :2 cents:

Thanks for that Jel, I'll look into it! :thumbsup

In the meantime 1000's of conspiracy imbeciles know the "truth" and can freely post it on Youtube :1orglaugh
Yeah it all makes so much sense.

Fixed, it was in one which I copied and pasted. Hopefully I've been referring webmasters via IP. Not that it matters, only $20 per month from it on average...or perhaps it would be a lot more by now if the HTML had been uppercase :thumbsup

According to the National Cancer Institute's own budgetary figures - they spend on average $4,900,000,000 ($4.9 billion) per year on cancer research.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f...search-funding

Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).


THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

Thank you. That was my point all along.

"There is not one, but many cures for cancer available. But they are all being systematically suppressed by the ACS, the NCI and the major oncology centres. They have too much of an interest in the status quo."
Dr Robert Atkins, M.D.

"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuating charities....It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested....The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all."
Robert Houston and Gary Null

I also found this interesting:

Thanks for those SilentKnight, very interesting :thumbsup

Is this another "question" :1orglaugh

Can you name some of these cures?

But let me guess, you really don't believe it. There is just no other possibility right?
And you really are not a lunatic conspiracy theorist right? Just asking questions :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Silentknight, now i have a question for you.
The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something?

Please explain (in detail) how that works.

Attaboy, good puppy. Pavlov approves of your obedience :1orglaugh

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

Such submissive obedience must be rewarded. :thumbsup

Another treat, 'atta boy.

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Why can't you just answer my simple question? Why do you refuse to?

Oh, I dunno. Probably 'cuz survey says - you're an asshole? :1orglaugh

But here's another treat anyway (for being such an obedient asshole). :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

You can't be 50. Impossible.

Oh and ofcourse the answer is because you can't back up any of your claims. Just like every other conspiracy theorist on this forum. Just like your 18 year old buddies you will avoid every question. Typicaly conspiracy behaviour.

50 years old.....

I just can't get over it.

http://crappypictures.com/images/201...en-record8.gif

http://www.primermagazine.com/wp-con...its_Header.gif

http://crappypictures.com/images/201...en-record8.gif

There's a LOT you can't get over, pavlovian puppy. :1orglaugh

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resveratrol

Maybe someone else can ask Silentknight to back up his claims. Let's see what his answer will be then.

really just have to look at africa/3rd world countries

apparently they don't care so much, they don't care to hide their trails

and these are big trails

Groveling in the sandbox now, my submissive little pavlovian pound puppy.

You must really enjoy these treats. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Is there any possibility you will back up your claims to me or anyone else in this thread? If not, why not?
Please, act like a 50 year old for just 30 seconds.

Pavlovian pound puppy seem confoosed.

I snap my fingers...YOU do the tricks.

No biscuit treat this time. :evil-laug

Fuck me, you are one sad fucking idiot. Unbelievable.

omg hahaaha :thumbsup

Tsk, tsk...tantrums will get you no biscuit. lololol

http://crappypictures.com/images/201...en-record8.gif

Love will cure anything and everything including cancer.

If you had the cure for cancer, you would make more money in one lump sum, than you could make in your lifetime milking patients

everyone below you would then use it to milk patients. what im saying is the cure for cancer is not being with held in some sort of conspiracy

Read for more than 30 Seconds on this site if your ADHD will permit :pimp

http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

Still no proof, as per usual. Just bullshit.

We have HPV vaccine and it doesn't come without risks. Most normal vaccines have little to no real risks but cancer vaccines are different.

Cancer is mostly a problem of genetics as we age. Most people get cancer when they are older and is probably caused by genetic mutation that occurs as a natural part of genetic replication.

Your genes copy themselves so many billions of times a day. I think it's trillions per year or something. Every time the DNA separates to make new copies there is a chance of a mistake. Most of these mistakes are harmless or at least they seem to be. As the mistakes add up however they materialize as various diseases.

In the case of children with cancer it is often a specific bad gene or serious of mutations passed on by the parent that mean the child will develop cancer early on.

It all comes down to DNA and it is very hard to fix. You are going to have to engineer a virus to replace these genes. We have done this with a few disease but it's very difficult. I expect when they have a breakthrough and find a fix it all type of virus delivery system this is when you will see real cancer cures.

While we wait a decade or 2 for this cancer vaccines may be the best bet or maybe treatments live we have for HIV where you are on lifetime meds. It sucks but it's not a scam. It's just that genetic engineering is not so easy.

Of course this means that when we really get permanent cures for cancer we are also going to have cures for hundreds of other things and we might even be changing our eye and hair color or how strong we want our bones to be.

Stick to SEO, don't bother with anything more complicated.

Not really. most frequent ones eg. lung cancer or colorectal cancer are mostly due to lifestyle.

They don't track the risks, like Cot Death, MS, Diabetes Type 1, Epilepsy, Autism, Asthma, Eczema etc. Some of these are only observable 6 months or more after vaccination, they don't look for them as then they would have to pay out compensation and it would put people off vaccination. They are no doubt aware as when they send a new vaccine to a particular area they'll see the rate of a specific disease skyrocket shortly afterwards based on the treatments they sell. It's actually beneficial for their profits to cause us lifelong problems with their vaccines.

whos "they"? are they the ones researching cancer?

How do i avoid colorectal cancer

That's what they'll have us believe, they don't want people taking preventative measures with their lifestyle, Cancer is big money, they don't want to help you avoid it. It's like if the adult industry told people how to avoid paying for porn, or to avoid being addicted to porn.

The grants given for Cancer research are to look for genetic problems, that's why we always hear this research. There aren't grants given to look at which vaccines caused Cancer, despite every vaccine insert warning that they're Carcinogenic. Whoever controls the flow of money controls the research.

Look back to when Merck's Polio vaccine was contaminated with Cancer virus SV40, it was the head of vaccines at Merck who discovered this. It also had Epstein-Barr. Both have since been found in patients of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a type of Cancer which many thousands of Americans go down with every year. It causes the same Cancer in rodents. An accident? Seems unlikely given that Bayer's documents show they knowingly sold HIV-contaminated vaccines. This is about sowing the seeds of disease to boost profit.

The funders of the research, the researchers can only research what they are given money to research. They have to go where the money is. Big Pharma got corrupted ever since the Rockefellers got involved.