GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Cancer is curable (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1102818)

Jel 03-13-2013 02:53 AM

holy shit :1orglaugh

wehateporn 03-13-2013 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bl4h (Post 19525412)
if you had a cure for cancer youd be a quadratraniliare. I mean you dont even need to be a scientist to understand why cancer is so difficult to treat especially in later stages

In this world you'd either be in jail or 6 foot under :2 cents:

bl4h 03-13-2013 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525468)
In this world you'd either be in jail or 6 foot under :2 cents:

and then the person that killed you would be rich. theres no reason to not release the cure for cancer lol. doing that would make hitting people pointless in life. youre rich bro

AllAboutCams 03-13-2013 04:19 AM

I cure cancer with my spunk!

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-13-2013 04:28 AM

Chemotherapy
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8...d6muo1_500.jpg

undersoul 03-13-2013 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony (Post 19525509)

sad but true

wehateporn 03-13-2013 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bl4h (Post 19525487)
and then the person that killed you would be rich. theres no reason to not release the cure for cancer lol. doing that would make hitting people pointless in life. youre rich bro

The way to make money from Cancer is not to cure it, but rather to spread it inside vaccines and use dangerous treatments to treat it which will cause future Cancers. i.e. repeat business :2 cents:

PR_Glen 03-13-2013 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525085)
The people at the very top of Pharma will know exactly what the natural Cancer cures are, they would never use Chemo themselves, they know it's to cause secondaries, they designed the system that way. They will have avoided the Cancer-causing vaccines. If they still go down with Cancer, they'll know exactly what the cure is, as it'll be whatever they've been trying to publicly discredit e.g. Apricot seeds :2 cents:

OK this is a complete lie, so bad that it rattles my bones, but lets just pretend a minute that your delusional fantasy is accurate this time.

The people at the top would make so much money selling a cure for this rampant disease that they could buy their own country and live the lives of evil kings all they want, just as you assume they do already. So my question is, why haven't they done this? Please hold the lies and speculation this time around.

Jel 03-13-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525468)
In this world you'd either be in jail or 6 foot under :2 cents:

You actually believe this don't you :helpme

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Dirty F 03-13-2013 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19525908)
OK this is a complete lie, so bad that it rattles my bones, but lets just pretend a minute that your delusional fantasy is accurate this time.

The people at the top would make so much money selling a cure for this rampant disease that they could buy their own country and live the lives of evil kings all they want, just as you assume they do already. So my question is, why haven't they done this? Please hold the lies and speculation this time around.

Amazing how every single post from this idiot is full of shit. I really mean everything this guy says. Not even sure how that is possible.

wehateporn 03-13-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 19525919)
You actually believe this don't you :helpme

One only has to look through history, labs being burned down, scientists murdered etc. Then we look at Brzezinski's award winning documentary, where they try to throw him in prison. This is not about belief this is fact. :2 cents:

Jman 03-13-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse (Post 19524344)
Unfortunately, idiocy isn't.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dirty F 03-13-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 19525919)
You actually believe this don't you :helpme

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Yes, in his little fantasy world people get murdered all the time for knowing the truth. As always he won't be able to back this up though but that doesn't seem to bother him one bit.

wehateporn 03-13-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19525908)
OK this is a complete lie, so bad that it rattles my bones, but lets just pretend a minute that your delusional fantasy is accurate this time.

The people at the top would make so much money selling a cure for this rampant disease that they could buy their own country and live the lives of evil kings all they want, just as you assume they do already. So my question is, why haven't they done this? Please hold the lies and speculation this time around.

You're not thinking clearly, they already are making serious money from Cancer, they make over $2000 per month per Cancer patient. They wouldn't if they gave them a non-patentable cure :2 cents:

wehateporn 03-13-2013 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 19525919)

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Thanks for that Jel, I'll look into it! :thumbsup

Dirty F 03-13-2013 09:46 AM

In the meantime 1000's of conspiracy imbeciles know the "truth" and can freely post it on Youtube :1orglaugh
Yeah it all makes so much sense.

wehateporn 03-13-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 19525919)
ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Fixed, it was in one which I copied and pasted. Hopefully I've been referring webmasters via IP. Not that it matters, only $20 per month from it on average...or perhaps it would be a lot more by now if the HTML had been uppercase :thumbsup

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525941)
You're not thinking clearly, they already are making serious money from Cancer, they make over $2000 per month per Cancer patient. They wouldn't if they gave them a non-patentable cure :2 cents:

According to the National Cancer Institute's own budgetary figures - they spend on average $4,900,000,000 ($4.9 billion) per year on cancer research.

Quote:

NCI?s budget for FY 2010 was $5.1* billion, excluding the additional $1.3* billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds received by the Institute for spending in FY 2009 and FY 2010. Overall, NCI?s budget has been relatively flat in recent years. During the period from 2005 through 2010, the NCI budget averaged $4.9* billion per year.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f...search-funding

wehateporn 03-13-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19525978)
According to the National Cancer Institute's own budgetary figures - they spend on average $4,900,000,000 ($4.9 billion) per year on cancer research.

Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).


THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

purecane 03-13-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525980)
Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).




THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html


"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."





Thank you. That was my point all along.

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19525980)
Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).


THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

"There is not one, but many cures for cancer available. But they are all being systematically suppressed by the ACS, the NCI and the major oncology centres. They have too much of an interest in the status quo."
Dr Robert Atkins, M.D.

"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuating charities....It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested....The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all."
Robert Houston and Gary Null

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 10:15 AM

I also found this interesting:

Quote:

A large portion of money donated to cancer research by the public is spent on animal research which has, since its inception, been widely condemned as a waste of time and resources. For instance, consider the 1981 Congressional Testimony by Dr. Irwin Bross, former director of the Sloan-Kettering, the largest cancer research institute in the world, and then Director of Biostatistics at Roswell Park Memorial Institute for Cancer Research, Bufallo, NY: "The uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well known. For example, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumph due to use of animal model systems. However, here again, these exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed by the same people who get the federal dollars for animal research. There is little, if any, factual evidence that would support these claims. Indeed, while conflicting animal results have often delayed and hampered advances in the war on cancer, they have never produced a single substantial advance either in the prevention or treatment of human cancer. For instance, practically all of the chemotherapeutic agents which are of value in the treatment of human cancer were found in a clinical context rather than in animal studies."

In fact, many substances which cause cancer in humans are marketed as "safe" on the basis of animal tests. As expressed by Dr. Werner Hartinger of Germany, in regard to cancer-causing products of the pharmaceutical-petro-chemical industry, "Their constant consumption is legalised on the basis of misleading animal experiments . . . which seduce the consumer into a false sense of security."

wehateporn 03-13-2013 10:23 AM

Thanks for those SilentKnight, very interesting :thumbsup

Dirty F 03-13-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19525993)
"There is not one, but many cures for cancer available.

Is this another "question" :1orglaugh

Can you name some of these cures?

But let me guess, you really don't believe it. There is just no other possibility right?
And you really are not a lunatic conspiracy theorist right? Just asking questions :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Dirty F 03-13-2013 10:51 AM

Silentknight, now i have a question for you.
The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something?

Please explain (in detail) how that works.

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526081)
Silentknight, now i have a question for you.
The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something?

Please explain (in detail) how that works.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526078)
Is this another "question" :1orglaugh

Can you name some of these cures?

But let me guess, you really don't believe it. There is just no other possibility right?
And you really are not a lunatic conspiracy theorist right? Just asking questions :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Attaboy, good puppy. Pavlov approves of your obedience :1orglaugh

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Dirty F 03-13-2013 11:09 AM

No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

Dirty F 03-13-2013 11:16 AM

Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526113)
No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526131)
Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

Such submissive obedience must be rewarded. :thumbsup

Another treat, 'atta boy.

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Dirty F 03-13-2013 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19526141)
Such submissive obedience must be rewarded. :thumbsup

Another treat, 'atta boy.

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Why can't you just answer my simple question? Why do you refuse to?

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526154)
Why can't you just answer my simple question? Why do you refuse to?

Oh, I dunno. Probably 'cuz survey says - you're an asshole? :1orglaugh

But here's another treat anyway (for being such an obedient asshole). :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

http://www.petexpertise.com/images/d...sted-treat.jpg

Dirty F 03-13-2013 11:35 AM

You can't be 50. Impossible.

Dirty F 03-13-2013 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19526167)
Oh, I dunno. Probably 'cuz survey says - you're an asshole? :1orglaugh

Oh and ofcourse the answer is because you can't back up any of your claims. Just like every other conspiracy theorist on this forum. Just like your 18 year old buddies you will avoid every question. Typicaly conspiracy behaviour.

50 years old.....

I just can't get over it.

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526180)
You can't be 50. Impossible.

http://crappypictures.com/images/201...en-record8.gif

http://www.primermagazine.com/wp-con...its_Header.gif

SilentKnight 03-13-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19526187)
I just can't get over it.

http://crappypictures.com/images/201...en-record8.gif

There's a LOT you can't get over, pavlovian puppy. :1orglaugh

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-13-2013 12:08 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resveratrol

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-13-2013 12:12 PM


Jel 03-13-2013 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony (Post 19526266)


Dirty F 03-13-2013 12:21 PM

Maybe someone else can ask Silentknight to back up his claims. Let's see what his answer will be then.

_Richard_ 03-13-2013 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19526001)
I also found this interesting:

really just have to look at africa/3rd world countries

apparently they don't care so much, they don't care to hide their trails

and these are big trails


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123