Cancer is curable - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel

You actually believe this don't you

One only has to look through history, labs being burned down, scientists murdered etc. Then we look at Brzezinski's award winning documentary, where they try to throw him in prison. This is not about belief this is fact.

Jman · 03-13-2013, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopottomouse

Unfortunately, idiocy isn't.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel

You actually believe this don't you

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Yes, in his little fantasy world people get murdered all the time for knowing the truth. As always he won't be able to back this up though but that doesn't seem to bother him one bit.

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen

OK this is a complete lie, so bad that it rattles my bones, but lets just pretend a minute that your delusional fantasy is accurate this time.

The people at the top would make so much money selling a cure for this rampant disease that they could buy their own country and live the lives of evil kings all they want, just as you assume they do already. So my question is, why haven't they done this? Please hold the lies and speculation this time around.

You're not thinking clearly, they already are making serious money from Cancer, they make over $2000 per month per Cancer patient. They wouldn't if they gave them a non-patentable cure

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Thanks for that Jel, I'll look into it!

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 09:46 AM

In the meantime 1000's of conspiracy imbeciles know the "truth" and can freely post it on Youtube

Yeah it all makes so much sense.

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel

ps - not sure whether it's still the case, but I'm 99.99% sure that with ccbill codes the &html needs to be capitals or it doesn't track correctly - needs to be ccbillcode_here&HTML=http:// www. blahblah.com/etc

Fixed, it was in one which I copied and pasted. Hopefully I've been referring webmasters via IP. Not that it matters, only $20 per month from it on average...or perhaps it would be a lot more by now if the HTML had been uppercase

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

You're not thinking clearly, they already are making serious money from Cancer, they make over $2000 per month per Cancer patient. They wouldn't if they gave them a non-patentable cure

According to the National Cancer Institute's own budgetary figures - they spend on average $4,900,000,000 ($4.9 billion) per year on cancer research.

Quote:

NCI?s budget for FY 2010 was $5.1* billion, excluding the additional $1.3* billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds received by the Institute for spending in FY 2009 and FY 2010. Overall, NCI?s budget has been relatively flat in recent years. During the period from 2005 through 2010, the NCI budget averaged $4.9* billion per year.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f...search-funding

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

According to the National Cancer Institute's own budgetary figures - they spend on average $4,900,000,000 ($4.9 billion) per year on cancer research.

Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).

THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

purecane · 03-13-2013, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).

THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

Thank you. That was my point all along.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Indeed...

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancer research organisations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them."

Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).

THE CHARITY AND CANCER RESEARCH RACKETS
http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

"the purpose of cancer research is not to find a cure for cancer (these have all been found years ago) or other diseases but to perpetuate the cancer industry that in the US alone was turning over $107 Billion in 1994, or $400 Billion worldwide."

"There is not one, but many cures for cancer available. But they are all being systematically suppressed by the ACS, the NCI and the major oncology centres. They have too much of an interest in the status quo."
Dr Robert Atkins, M.D.

"A solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuating charities....It would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested....The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all."
Robert Houston and Gary Null

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 10:15 AM

I also found this interesting:

Quote:

A large portion of money donated to cancer research by the public is spent on animal research which has, since its inception, been widely condemned as a waste of time and resources. For instance, consider the 1981 Congressional Testimony by Dr. Irwin Bross, former director of the Sloan-Kettering, the largest cancer research institute in the world, and then Director of Biostatistics at Roswell Park Memorial Institute for Cancer Research, Bufallo, NY: "The uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well known. For example, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumph due to use of animal model systems. However, here again, these exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed by the same people who get the federal dollars for animal research. There is little, if any, factual evidence that would support these claims. Indeed, while conflicting animal results have often delayed and hampered advances in the war on cancer, they have never produced a single substantial advance either in the prevention or treatment of human cancer. For instance, practically all of the chemotherapeutic agents which are of value in the treatment of human cancer were found in a clinical context rather than in animal studies."

In fact, many substances which cause cancer in humans are marketed as "safe" on the basis of animal tests. As expressed by Dr. Werner Hartinger of Germany, in regard to cancer-causing products of the pharmaceutical-petro-chemical industry, "Their constant consumption is legalised on the basis of misleading animal experiments . . . which seduce the consumer into a false sense of security."

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 10:23 AM

Thanks for those SilentKnight, very interesting

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

"There is not one, but many cures for cancer available.

Is this another "question"

Can you name some of these cures?

But let me guess, you really don't believe it. There is just no other possibility right?
And you really are not a lunatic conspiracy theorist right? Just asking questions

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 10:51 AM

Silentknight, now i have a question for you.
The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something?

Please explain (in detail) how that works.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Silentknight, now i have a question for you.
The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something?

Please explain (in detail) how that works.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Is this another "question"

Can you name some of these cures?

But let me guess, you really don't believe it. There is just no other possibility right?
And you really are not a lunatic conspiracy theorist right? Just asking questions

Attaboy, good puppy. Pavlov approves of your obedience

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 11:09 AM

No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 11:16 AM

Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

Such submissive obedience must be rewarded.

Another treat, 'atta boy.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Such submissive obedience must be rewarded.

Another treat, 'atta boy.

Why can't you just answer my simple question? Why do you refuse to?

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Why can't you just answer my simple question? Why do you refuse to?

Oh, I dunno. Probably 'cuz survey says - you're an asshole?

But here's another treat anyway (for being such an obedient asshole).

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 11:35 AM

You can't be 50. Impossible.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

Oh, I dunno. Probably 'cuz survey says - you're an asshole?

Oh and ofcourse the answer is because you can't back up any of your claims. Just like every other conspiracy theorist on this forum. Just like your 18 year old buddies you will avoid every question. Typicaly conspiracy behaviour.

50 years old.....

I just can't get over it.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

You can't be 50. Impossible.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

I just can't get over it.

There's a LOT you can't get over, pavlovian puppy.

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE · 03-13-2013, 12:08 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resveratrol

Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE · 03-13-2013, 12:12 PM

Jel · 03-13-2013, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monotony

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 12:21 PM

Maybe someone else can ask Silentknight to back up his claims. Let's see what his answer will be then.

_Richard_ · 03-13-2013, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight

I also found this interesting:

really just have to look at africa/3rd world countries

apparently they don't care so much, they don't care to hide their trails

and these are big trails

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Maybe someone else can ask Silentknight to back up his claims. Let's see what his answer will be then.

Groveling in the sandbox now, my submissive little pavlovian pound puppy.

You must really enjoy these treats.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 01:06 PM

Is there any possibility you will back up your claims to me or anyone else in this thread? If not, why not?
Please, act like a 50 year old for just 30 seconds.

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Is there any possibility you will back up your claims to me or anyone else in this thread? If not, why not?
Please, act like a 50 year old for just 30 seconds.

Pavlovian pound puppy seem confoosed.

I snap my fingers...YOU do the tricks.

No biscuit treat this time.

Dirty F · 03-13-2013, 01:19 PM

Fuck me, you are one sad fucking idiot. Unbelievable.

Xreatix · 03-13-2013, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllAboutCams

I cure cancer with my spunk!

omg hahaaha

SilentKnight · 03-13-2013, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Fuck me, you are one sad fucking idiot. Unbelievable.

Tsk, tsk...tantrums will get you no biscuit. lololol

_Richard_ · 03-13-2013, 02:35 PM

chief99 · 03-13-2013, 03:02 PM

Love will cure anything and everything including cancer.

bl4h · 03-13-2013, 03:07 PM

If you had the cure for cancer, you would make more money in one lump sum, than you could make in your lifetime milking patients

everyone below you would then use it to milk patients. what im saying is the cure for cancer is not being with held in some sort of conspiracy

wehateporn · 03-13-2013, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F

Is there any possibility you will back up your claims to me or anyone else in this thread? If not, why not?
Please, act like a 50 year old for just 30 seconds.

Read for more than 30 Seconds on this site if your ADHD will permit

http://www.whale.to/cancer/charities.html

Si · 03-13-2013, 08:12 PM

Still no proof, as per usual. Just bullshit.

mikesinner · 03-14-2013, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey

well, I don't know if curable, but in Cuba there are vaccines to prevent at least 5 types of cancer. Obviously, you won't see it in the news, but it's a known fact and certificated by many health NGO, including World Health Organization, and UN.

Just imagine: a free vaccine would kill the billion dollars industries around cancer so.... no vaccine for you.

PS: I know this because it was too late for me to get a vaccine, but I got my chemo meds from Cuba for a fraction of the "real" cost at pharmacies

We have HPV vaccine and it doesn't come without risks. Most normal vaccines have little to no real risks but cancer vaccines are different.

mikesinner · 03-14-2013, 12:36 AM

Cancer is mostly a problem of genetics as we age. Most people get cancer when they are older and is probably caused by genetic mutation that occurs as a natural part of genetic replication.

Your genes copy themselves so many billions of times a day. I think it's trillions per year or something. Every time the DNA separates to make new copies there is a chance of a mistake. Most of these mistakes are harmless or at least they seem to be. As the mistakes add up however they materialize as various diseases.

In the case of children with cancer it is often a specific bad gene or serious of mutations passed on by the parent that mean the child will develop cancer early on.

It all comes down to DNA and it is very hard to fix. You are going to have to engineer a virus to replace these genes. We have done this with a few disease but it's very difficult. I expect when they have a breakthrough and find a fix it all type of virus delivery system this is when you will see real cancer cures.

While we wait a decade or 2 for this cancer vaccines may be the best bet or maybe treatments live we have for HIV where you are on lifetime meds. It sucks but it's not a scam. It's just that genetic engineering is not so easy.

Of course this means that when we really get permanent cures for cancer we are also going to have cures for hundreds of other things and we might even be changing our eye and hair color or how strong we want our bones to be.

Kolargol · 03-14-2013, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Si

Twisted conspiracy theorist logic at work, as per.

You spend X amount on headache tablets, why does chemo cost so much more?

Stick to SEO, don't bother with anything more complicated.

Kolargol · 03-14-2013, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner

Cancer is mostly a problem of genetics

Not really. most frequent ones eg. lung cancer or colorectal cancer are mostly due to lifestyle.

wehateporn · 03-14-2013, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner

Most normal vaccines have little to no real risks but cancer vaccines are different.

They don't track the risks, like Cot Death, MS, Diabetes Type 1, Epilepsy, Autism, Asthma, Eczema etc. Some of these are only observable 6 months or more after vaccination, they don't look for them as then they would have to pay out compensation and it would put people off vaccination. They are no doubt aware as when they send a new vaccine to a particular area they'll see the rate of a specific disease skyrocket shortly afterwards based on the treatments they sell. It's actually beneficial for their profits to cause us lifelong problems with their vaccines.

bl4h · 03-14-2013, 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

They don't track the risks, like Cot Death, MS, Diabetes Type 1, Epilepsy, Autism, Asthma, Eczema etc. Some of these are only observable 6 months or more after vaccination, they don't look for them as then they would have to pay out compensation and it would put people off vaccination. They are no doubt aware as when they send a new vaccine to a particular area they'll see the rate of a specific disease skyrocket shortly afterwards based on the treatments they sell. It's actually beneficial for their profits to cause us lifelong problems with their vaccines.

whos "they"? are they the ones researching cancer?

AllAboutCams · 03-14-2013, 04:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kolargol

Not really. most frequent ones eg. lung cancer or colorectal cancer are mostly due to lifestyle.

How do i avoid colorectal cancer

wehateporn · 03-14-2013, 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner

Cancer is mostly a problem of genetics as we age. Most people get cancer when they are older and is probably caused by genetic mutation that occurs as a natural part of genetic replication.

That's what they'll have us believe, they don't want people taking preventative measures with their lifestyle, Cancer is big money, they don't want to help you avoid it. It's like if the adult industry told people how to avoid paying for porn, or to avoid being addicted to porn.

The grants given for Cancer research are to look for genetic problems, that's why we always hear this research. There aren't grants given to look at which vaccines caused Cancer, despite every vaccine insert warning that they're Carcinogenic. Whoever controls the flow of money controls the research.

Look back to when Merck's Polio vaccine was contaminated with Cancer virus SV40, it was the head of vaccines at Merck who discovered this. It also had Epstein-Barr. Both have since been found in patients of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, a type of Cancer which many thousands of Americans go down with every year. It causes the same Cancer in rodents. An accident? Seems unlikely given that Bayer's documents show they knowingly sold HIV-contaminated vaccines. This is about sowing the seeds of disease to boost profit.

wehateporn · 03-14-2013, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bl4h

whos "they"? are they the ones researching cancer?

The funders of the research, the researchers can only research what they are given money to research. They have to go where the money is. Big Pharma got corrupted ever since the Rockefellers got involved.

03-13-2013, 10:23 AM	#63
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Thanks for those SilentKnight, very interesting __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

03-14-2013, 12:36 AM	#93
mikesinner Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,646	Cancer is mostly a problem of genetics as we age. Most people get cancer when they are older and is probably caused by genetic mutation that occurs as a natural part of genetic replication. Your genes copy themselves so many billions of times a day. I think it's trillions per year or something. Every time the DNA separates to make new copies there is a chance of a mistake. Most of these mistakes are harmless or at least they seem to be. As the mistakes add up however they materialize as various diseases. In the case of children with cancer it is often a specific bad gene or serious of mutations passed on by the parent that mean the child will develop cancer early on. It all comes down to DNA and it is very hard to fix. You are going to have to engineer a virus to replace these genes. We have done this with a few disease but it's very difficult. I expect when they have a breakthrough and find a fix it all type of virus delivery system this is when you will see real cancer cures. While we wait a decade or 2 for this cancer vaccines may be the best bet or maybe treatments live we have for HIV where you are on lifetime meds. It sucks but it's not a scam. It's just that genetic engineering is not so easy. Of course this means that when we really get permanent cures for cancer we are also going to have cures for hundreds of other things and we might even be changing our eye and hair color or how strong we want our bones to be. __________________ My Best Sponsors MPl l Camsl CUMSHOTSl LESBIANSl FETISHl BJ RACESl TEEN BJl BSDMl VODl USE YOUR PC TO CURE CANCER

03-13-2013, 09:46 AM	#56
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	In the meantime 1000's of conspiracy imbeciles know the "truth" and can freely post it on Youtube Yeah it all makes so much sense.

03-13-2013, 10:51 AM	#65
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Silentknight, now i have a question for you. The 10's or maybe 100's of thousands of people worldwide who are working daily on finding a cure are all part of the conspiracy? They all know they really are not allowed to find one and are just messing around a bit? Just pretending to be working on something? Please explain (in detail) how that works.

03-13-2013, 11:09 AM	#67
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	No answer? Who would've thought. You're doing the conspiracy routine very well. You're learning fast.

03-13-2013, 11:16 AM	#68
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Silentidiot, do you realize the average age for conspiracy nutters is about 18-25. You're 50 man. Being a conspiracy nutter at 25 is sad but being one at 50...i can't even think of a word that would explain how pathetic it is.

03-13-2013, 11:35 AM	#72
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	You can't be 50. Impossible.

03-13-2013, 12:08 PM	#76
Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE Barterer Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 4,864	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahydrocannabinol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resveratrol

03-13-2013, 12:12 PM	#77
Vapid - BANNED FOR LIFE Barterer Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 4,864

03-13-2013, 12:21 PM	#79
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Maybe someone else can ask Silentknight to back up his claims. Let's see what his answer will be then.

03-13-2013, 01:06 PM	#82
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Is there any possibility you will back up your claims to me or anyone else in this thread? If not, why not? Please, act like a 50 year old for just 30 seconds.

03-13-2013, 01:19 PM	#84
Dirty F Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 59,204	Fuck me, you are one sad fucking idiot. Unbelievable.

03-13-2013, 02:35 PM	#87
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989

03-13-2013, 03:02 PM	#88
chief99 Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 321	Love will cure anything and everything including cancer.

03-13-2013, 03:07 PM	#89
bl4h Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Philadelphia Posts: 1,282	If you had the cure for cancer, you would make more money in one lump sum, than you could make in your lifetime milking patients everyone below you would then use it to milk patients. what im saying is the cure for cancer is not being with held in some sort of conspiracy

03-13-2013, 08:12 PM	#91
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	Still no proof, as per usual. Just bullshit.