9/11 and all this time I thought it was a plane - GoFuckYourself.com

LRS · 09-16-2013, 05:08 AM

what do you guys think about this?

Arnox · 09-16-2013, 05:36 AM

I think a Youtube video doesn't counteract the incredible amount of evidence that the official story has behind it, including eyewitness accounts and expert analysis about what actually happened.

Markul · 09-16-2013, 05:58 AM

fitzmulti · 09-16-2013, 06:07 AM

My immediate thought was:
"NOT THIS FUCKING SHIT AGAIN!!"

Phoenix · 09-16-2013, 06:16 AM

the cnn footage shows the same thing.
i am sure there is some logical explanation though. As planes surely hit the towers.
Eye witnesses saw it.

nexcom28 · 09-16-2013, 06:26 AM

I just checked the original footage showing the first video and the wing doesn't do behind any building. I think this video is fake.

seeandsee · 09-16-2013, 06:31 AM

So what did hit building 2?

Phoenix · 09-16-2013, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nexcom28

I just checked the original footage showing the first video and the wing doesn't do behind any building. I think this video is fake.

dyna mo · 09-16-2013, 06:39 AM

the argument the youtuber is trying to make isn't solid. the fact is if he claims that clip is cgi, then i can claim his clip is cgi. simple as that.

his clip is cgi.

see what i did there?

easy breezy lemon squeezy.

dyna mo · 09-16-2013, 06:41 AM

but as always, i am open to the facts, so if someone can prove that his youtube video is not cgi/altered, go for it! i want to believe!!!

Rochard · 09-16-2013, 06:44 AM

This shit has gotten so old....

Phoenix · 09-16-2013, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

but as always, i am open to the facts, so if someone can prove that his youtube video is not cgi/altered, go for it! i want to believe!!!

i dont understand why it would be altered. Planes surely hit the building.

bronco67 · 09-16-2013, 06:52 AM

That building is between the camera and the tower. And why is this tool an expert on plane wings ability to slice through steel? He's a retard.

Case closed.

dyna mo · 09-16-2013, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

i dont understand why it would be altered. Planes surely hit the building.

the building in the background is shown to be in front of the left wing in the youtuber's youtube.

bronco67 · 09-16-2013, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the argument the youtuber is trying to make isn't solid. the fact is if he claims that clip is cgi, then i can claim his clip is cgi. simple as that.

his clip is cgi.

see what i did there?

easy breezy lemon squeezy.

His problem is that he doesn't understand three dimensional perspective.

Phoenix · 09-16-2013, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

That building is between the camera and the tower. And why is this tool an expert on plane wings ability to slice through steel? He's a retard.

Case closed.

That doesn't make sense. More likely the wing was lost in shadow, and just looks like it disappears.

Were the buildings, all three of them, pre-loaded with explosives?

That is a debate i don't mind getting into...but won't...lol

dyna mo · 09-16-2013, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

His problem is that he doesn't understand three dimensional perspective.

even better, the most simple answer is usually the right one.

i know with compression from telephoto lenses that this could be the case here. no alterations needed.

CaptainHowdy · 09-16-2013, 07:16 AM

bronco67 · 09-16-2013, 07:36 AM

Because I have nothing better to do today, let me show you how conspiracy nutters fuck themselves up by not doing their research.

Here's a pic of the area pre-attack. This is looking north towards uptown, because you can see the Empire state building in the distance. Note the tops of the buildings I've called out in the vid screen-cap, in respect to where they exist in lower Manhattan. The lens is very long, so the buildings appear to be the same size. But the two foreground buildings are in actuality very small compare to the twin towers -- as almost every building in the world is.

I say they're in the foreground, and not behind the twin towers(from the camera's view) because here's the flight path...

The plane swung around lower manhattan and went north, toward its target -- the south tower. If this guy would have spent 10 minutes on Google images, and looked at the geography, and had a basic understanding of camera lenses and perspective possibilities he would have still probably made this video --because he's a fucking idiot. Just like anyone else who believes it as soon as they see it.

Also, I know 2 people who watched the plane hit the south tower. They followed it with their eyeballs all the way to impact -- and they're not government cyborgs. I also know someone killed in the north tower(all his family has is a single vertebrae), and I was about a mile uptown when it happened. Not that it gives me any validity on the subject, but it drives me crazy to see all of these nutjobs who have never spent any time in New York trying to prove something didn't happen, when all of us who live in this area know it did. We're all connected to it in some way, whether we know someone who was killed, escaped, or saw it happen.

Phoenix · 09-16-2013, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

Because I have nothing better to do today, let me show you how conspiracy nutters fuck themselves up by not doing their research.

Here's a pic of the area pre-attack. This is looking north towards uptown, because you can see the Empire state building in the distance. Note the tops of the buildings I've called out in the vid screen-cap, in respect to where they exist in lower Manhattan. The lens is very long, so the buildings appear to be the same size. But the two foreground buildings are in actuality very small compare to the twin towers -- as almost every building in the world is.

I say they're in the foreground, and not behind the twin towers(from the camera's view) because here's the flight path...

The plane swung around lower manhattan and went north, toward its target -- the south tower. If this guy would have spent 10 minutes on Google images, and looked at the geography, and had a basic understanding of camera lenses and perspective possibilities he would have still probably made this video --because he's a fucking idiot. Just like anyone else who believes it as soon as they see it.

Also, I know 2 people who watched the plane hit the south tower. They followed it with their eyeballs all the way to impact -- and they're not government cyborgs. I also know someone killed in the north tower(all his family has is a single vertebrae), and I was about a mile uptown when it happened. Not that it gives me any validity on the subject, but it drives me crazy to see all of these nutjobs who have never spent any time in New York trying to prove something didn't happen, when all of us who live in this area know it did. We're all connected to it in some way, whether we know someone who was killed, escaped, or saw it happen.

Well there you go..i didnt believe it was a faked video.
I just thought it was an easier explanation that the wing looks like it disappears in shadow.

IF you have nothing else to do today..i have something you can promote..lol

Scott McD · 09-16-2013, 07:53 AM

People are still on this shit ?? Sheeeeeeesh !!!

Choopa_Pardo · 09-16-2013, 07:57 AM

Looks like a plane to me. What point are you trying to make?

9/11 truthers crack me up.

Tom_PM · 09-16-2013, 08:07 AM

It was perfectly obvious that the building he CLAIMED was "clearly in the background" was in fact in the foreground. Unbelievably idiotic.

Hey, it's hard to believe that in hurricane force winds that sticks of wood can penetrate solid trees and buildings too. Evidently this person is relying on the absolute faith in his audience to believe anything that they hear spoken with confidence. My take? He should be a preacher. That's the best vocation for bullshit artists.

stephane76 · 09-16-2013, 08:09 AM

this, first reply in the Comments:

Quote:

This is utter rubbish.
The apparent overlaying is caused by compression artifacts in the footage.
Codecs such as MPEG compression works by copying previous frames, so reducing file sizes. Only the moving areas are updated on a frame by frame basis. As the plane was moving and the building was not, it took a frame or so to catch up, so it appeared that the building was in front of the plane.
Anybody with the most rudimentary knowledge of digital video would know this.

bronco67 · 09-16-2013, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephane76

this, first reply in the Comments:

Actually, the wing does do what it appears to do in the video. It gets obscured by the building. There's no artifacting -- although what that commenter said is true when it comes to video compression.

rogueteens · 09-16-2013, 08:34 AM

if the clip really was fake then the faker did a fantastic job, watch as the plane passes the cloud of dust from the first strike, you can just see slight wind disturbance from the wing affecting the dust. that is an amazing attention to detail from the "faker"!

dyna mo · 09-16-2013, 08:40 AM

nice to see a few of us finally on the same page re: 9/11

pornguy · 09-16-2013, 08:45 AM

I was listening to some of the people in the back ground of those videos. Sounds like there sure was some question about that second airplane.

bronco67 · 09-16-2013, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy

I was listening to some of the people in the back ground of those videos. Sounds like there sure was some question about that second airplane.

"Why is it heading toward that building?"

_Richard_ · 09-16-2013, 10:31 AM

compression for those videos are awful.

I was looking at something during the japanese earthquakes/tsunami that was either a rocket/bizarre big ass fucking bird, that viewed in HD turned out to be a helicopter

2012 · 09-16-2013, 10:34 AM

Tom_PM · 09-16-2013, 10:36 AM

Still hard to imagine this being taken seriously. If that building was in the background, it would be so much taller than the twin towers. Just... like... wtf..

2MuchMark · 09-16-2013, 12:49 PM

The CGI guy deserves a punch in the head.

Rochard · 09-16-2013, 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the argument the youtuber is trying to make isn't solid. the fact is if he claims that clip is cgi, then i can claim his clip is cgi. simple as that.

his clip is cgi.

see what i did there?

easy breezy lemon squeezy.

Problem solved.

Can we move onto JFK or the moon walk from here on out?

epitome · 09-16-2013, 09:50 PM

Your title is misleading. You haven't always thought it was a plane... you're just saying that to try and add credibility you'll never have.

DBS.US · 09-16-2013, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Problem solved.

Can we move onto JFK or the moon walk from here on out?

NO MAN HAS EVER WALKED ON THE MOON.

09-16-2013, 05:08 AM	#1
LRS Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 324	9/11 and all this time I thought it was a plane what do you guys think about this? __________________ Do You Google? ICQ: 155-193

09-16-2013, 05:36 AM	#2
Arnox Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Radelaide Posts: 2,163	I think a Youtube video doesn't counteract the incredible amount of evidence that the official story has behind it, including eyewitness accounts and expert analysis about what actually happened. __________________ Need Text? X Copywriters \| Adult Writing Service - [email protected]

09-16-2013, 06:07 AM	#4
fitzmulti I Like Depth Of Field! Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA: 36.12318 N, 115.090219 W Posts: 14,861	My immediate thought was: "NOT THIS FUCKING SHIT AGAIN!!" __________________ www.SexyGirlsCash.com CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM // {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

09-16-2013, 06:16 AM	#5
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,457	the cnn footage shows the same thing. i am sure there is some logical explanation though. As planes surely hit the towers. Eye witnesses saw it. __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

09-16-2013, 06:31 AM	#7
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	So what did hit building 2? __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

09-16-2013, 05:58 AM	#3
Markul Likes Pie Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: The land that liberated porn Posts: 12,401

09-16-2013, 06:26 AM	#6
nexcom28 So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 3,716	I just checked the original footage showing the first video and the wing doesn't do behind any building. I think this video is fake.

09-16-2013, 06:39 AM	#9
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,291	the argument the youtuber is trying to make isn't solid. the fact is if he claims that clip is cgi, then i can claim his clip is cgi. simple as that. his clip is cgi. see what i did there? easy breezy lemon squeezy.

09-16-2013, 06:41 AM	#10
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,291	but as always, i am open to the facts, so if someone can prove that his youtube video is not cgi/altered, go for it! i want to believe!!!

09-16-2013, 06:44 AM	#11
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,936	This shit has gotten so old.... __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

09-16-2013, 06:52 AM	#13
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	That building is between the camera and the tower. And why is this tool an expert on plane wings ability to slice through steel? He's a retard. Case closed. __________________

09-16-2013, 07:16 AM	#18
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,551	__________________ Tjeezers.cam plus all sites $12.000,00. Transfer within 24 hours.

09-16-2013, 07:36 AM	#19
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	Because I have nothing better to do today, let me show you how conspiracy nutters fuck themselves up by not doing their research. Here's a pic of the area pre-attack. This is looking north towards uptown, because you can see the Empire state building in the distance. Note the tops of the buildings I've called out in the vid screen-cap, in respect to where they exist in lower Manhattan. The lens is very long, so the buildings appear to be the same size. But the two foreground buildings are in actuality very small compare to the twin towers -- as almost every building in the world is. I say they're in the foreground, and not behind the twin towers(from the camera's view) because here's the flight path... The plane swung around lower manhattan and went north, toward its target -- the south tower. If this guy would have spent 10 minutes on Google images, and looked at the geography, and had a basic understanding of camera lenses and perspective possibilities he would have still probably made this video --because he's a fucking idiot. Just like anyone else who believes it as soon as they see it. Also, I know 2 people who watched the plane hit the south tower. They followed it with their eyeballs all the way to impact -- and they're not government cyborgs. I also know someone killed in the north tower(all his family has is a single vertebrae), and I was about a mile uptown when it happened. Not that it gives me any validity on the subject, but it drives me crazy to see all of these nutjobs who have never spent any time in New York trying to prove something didn't happen, when all of us who live in this area know it did. We're all connected to it in some way, whether we know someone who was killed, escaped, or saw it happen. __________________ Last edited by bronco67; 09-16-2013 at 07:42 AM..

09-16-2013, 07:53 AM	#21
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	People are still on this shit ?? Sheeeeeeesh !!! __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

09-16-2013, 07:57 AM	#22
Choopa_Pardo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: NJ Posts: 1,629	Looks like a plane to me. What point are you trying to make? 9/11 truthers crack me up. __________________ AIM - thePardovich Email - [email protected] A World Wide Leader In Hosting! * CHOOPA.COM * Order Now!

09-16-2013, 08:07 AM	#23
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	It was perfectly obvious that the building he CLAIMED was "clearly in the background" was in fact in the foreground. Unbelievably idiotic. Hey, it's hard to believe that in hurricane force winds that sticks of wood can penetrate solid trees and buildings too. Evidently this person is relying on the absolute faith in his audience to believe anything that they hear spoken with confidence. My take? He should be a preacher. That's the best vocation for bullshit artists. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

09-16-2013, 08:34 AM	#26
rogueteens So fucking bland Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: England Posts: 8,005	if the clip really was fake then the faker did a fantastic job, watch as the plane passes the cloud of dust from the first strike, you can just see slight wind disturbance from the wing affecting the dust. that is an amazing attention to detail from the "faker"! __________________ Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES! Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!

09-16-2013, 08:40 AM	#27
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 65,291	nice to see a few of us finally on the same page re: 9/11

09-16-2013, 08:45 AM	#28
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	I was listening to some of the people in the back ground of those videos. Sounds like there sure was some question about that second airplane. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

09-16-2013, 10:31 AM	#30
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	compression for those videos are awful. I was looking at something during the japanese earthquakes/tsunami that was either a rocket/bizarre big ass fucking bird, that viewed in HD turned out to be a helicopter

09-16-2013, 10:34 AM	#31
2012 So Fucking What Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 17,189	__________________ best host: Webair \| best sponsor: Kink \| best coder: 688218966 \| Go Fuck Yourself

09-16-2013, 10:36 AM	#32
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Still hard to imagine this being taken seriously. If that building was in the background, it would be so much taller than the twin towers. Just... like... wtf.. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

09-16-2013, 12:49 PM	#33
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 49,240	The CGI guy deserves a punch in the head. __________________ Custom Coding \| Videochat Solutions \| Age Verification \| IT Help & Support www.2Much.net

09-16-2013, 09:50 PM	#35
epitome So Fucking Lame Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: St. Petersburg, FL Posts: 12,156	Your title is misleading. You haven't always thought it was a plane... you're just saying that to try and add credibility you'll never have. Last edited by epitome; 09-16-2013 at 09:58 PM..