Fradulent DMCA's from DMCA Piracy Prevention - GoFuckYourself.com

jscott · 12-25-2025, 01:23 PM

While we are all busy enjoying Xmas, opening presents & eating casseroles, DMCA Privacy Prevention was busy sending out fraudulent DMCA's hoping they could help their clients delist legal content from Google to help their client rankings (what other reason would there before sending their massive amounts of fraud DMCA's for legal licensed contents).

The frauds that run DMCA Privacy Prevention and/or the clients that hire them should be ashamed at what their business has become.

To anyone receiving these, make sure you always file counter-DMCA's, I believe someday Google will do what's right and ban/block/destroy companies that thrive on fraudulent activity like this.

Merry Xmas to you all, aside from anyone who does business with, works for, or runs DMCA Privacy Prevention Inc.

Umami · 12-25-2025, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott

While we are all busy enjoying Xmas, opening presents & eating casseroles, DMCA Privacy Prevention was busy sending out fraudulent DMCA's hoping they could help their clients delist legal content from Google to help their client rankings (what other reason would there before sending their massive amounts of fraud DMCA's for legal licensed contents).

The frauds that run DMCA Privacy Prevention and/or the clients that hire them should be ashamed at what their business has become.

To anyone receiving these, make sure you always file counter-DMCA's, I believe someday Google will do what's right and ban/block/destroy companies that thrive on fraudulent activity like this.

Merry Xmas to you all, aside from anyone who does business with, works for, or runs DMCA Privacy Prevention Inc.

What are they getting you on? Chaturbate API?

jscott · 12-25-2025, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Umami

What are they getting you on? Chaturbate API?

They're filing fraudulent DMCA's regarding old legal paysite content, from sponsor sites like Brazzers, EvilAngel, Bangbros, etc, they say the original urls are X, Instagram, Onlyfans etc.

Reno78 · 12-25-2025, 04:02 PM

DMCA Piracy Prevention is the worst of all similar companies. About six months ago, they sent me up to 100 fraudulent DMCA notices a day for 10 days straight. In total, they managed to remove about 1,300 URLs from Google, including those with the highest traffic. It was a nightmare. I lost a third of my traffic.

I contacted them several times and asked them to stop. Finally, I got a response from them saying that they would put me on their blacklist. I don't know if they really did, but it stopped after ten days.

Of course, I sent counter-notices to all of their DMCA notices. Just filling out all the forms every day took me an hour or two.

It took four months for Google to respond and gradually start returning the URLs to the search results. I had given up hope. I did a 301 redirect for the most important URLs to get them back into Google.

It's been half a year now, but every day I'm afraid it will start again. They are capable of destroying any website that has traffic from Google. It doesn't matter how big your website is. They are capable of sending DMCA notices with 200 URLs a day or even more.

Google won't do anything about it. I wrote them several emails and filled out several of their contact forms before I finally got a response. They said it's their policy to remove URLs after they receive a DMCA complaint. They told me to file a counter-notification and they might return the URLs to the results.

The only thing I've noticed is that Google now responds much faster to counter-notices. It no longer takes four months, but maybe two days.

Reno78 · 12-25-2025, 04:53 PM

A few more things.

There's no way to defend against it. They use a script to download all URLs for a specific website directly from Google results. It's not complicated. Then they send a DMCA and don't even bother to check if there is any content on those URLs. The DMCA contained URLs to pages that were on the first page of Google, as well as URLs that had no traffic or were even redirected, but were simply indexed by Google.

The worst part is that it all happens automatically. Everything is handled by a computer. They send DMCA notices 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. No one at Google checks their DMCA complaints. A DMCA notice arrives and the URL is automatically deleted from Google. I don't know how they got that status. With other companies, Google at least verifies the formalities. Or it has happened to me that I received a DMCA notice and a few hours later an email from Google saying that they had checked it, recognized it as an unjustified complaint, and returned the URL to the results themselves. And usually, Google doesn't send complaints from other companies right away. The claim date is a few days ago. But with DMCA Piracy Prevention, those notices come in real time. Easily 50 per hour. Before you can fill out one counter-notice, you'll get 20 more DMCA notices.

There are other companies like Bruqi, Leak Cleaner, Traqeer, but none of them are as bad as DMCA Piracy Prevention.

natkejs · 12-26-2025, 01:24 AM

I counter them automatically using AI, costs me like $30 per 100 counter notices. It's not perfect but it helps keep them at bay during periods when getting hit hard.

Don't mind sharing my solution, it's not advanced, not even that good but it kinds of works. Lets see if I get around to making a thread about it. Surely someone could make it much better.

celandina · 12-26-2025, 04:03 AM

I do not get it.They are taking down YOUR ORIGINALLY created content? Or likely pirated ( oops sorry ) I mean " user submitted" content to a tube?

geirlur · 12-26-2025, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by natkejs

I counter them automatically using AI, costs me like $30 per 100 counter notices. It's not perfect but it helps keep them at bay during periods when getting hit hard.

I use an old program caleld TypeItIn so I don't have to write the same stuff all the time..
probably better tools for this but that's the one I've always used

jscott · 12-26-2025, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

I do not get it.They are taking down YOUR ORIGINALLY created content? Or likely pirated ( oops sorry ) I mean " user submitted" content to a tube?

I'm talking about sponsor provided licensed content.

This is what happens:

1. a content producer produces legally licensed content of models to go on paysite/sponsor sites.

2. affiliates promote sponsor sites with that content

3. years pass, the models open their onlyfans/manyvids and work for themselves

4. the models (maybe urged by DMCA services) want to knockout all their old content and all competitors to boost their own OF/MV rankings by DMCA'ing affiliate contents and have their licensed & legal contents removed from Google

This is fraud by the DMCA services and by those who pay them to do it.

mechanicvirus · 12-26-2025, 11:37 AM

You have to CC every paysite contact you have with these DMCA emails.

You will also have to face completely false DMCA companies with zero contact such as:

Leak Cleaner
CopyArmor
DMCA.Red
Self titled "dmca" on the form that is clearly not an agency

Kelli58 · 12-26-2025, 03:31 PM

These automated DMCA companies are THE WORST. So many fucking false DMCA's it's out of hand.

xxxclusive · 12-26-2025, 06:03 PM

If it's really sponsor provided content it's likely that you are not whitelisted by those sevices, when I use it can whitelist pages where I know they have trailers of my stuff. The DMCAs are automated now and everything that triggers the keywords gets DMCA.

natkejs · 12-26-2025, 11:17 PM

If only they used some type of fingerprinting, but they just target search strings.

And with the millions of aspiring models, some names are pretty generic and can fit into many other names or even general niches / descriptions. Extreme example, call yourself Anna and then let these bots loose on your "trademark", but that's basically what's happening.

Getting borderline annoying.

Kelli58 · 12-27-2025, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxclusive

If it's really sponsor provided content it's likely that you are not whitelisted by those sevices, when I use it can whitelist pages where I know they have trailers of my stuff. The DMCAs are automated now and everything that triggers the keywords gets DMCA.

Most of those services don't give a fuck about being whitelisted. Let's say you are right and he's posting sponsored content. Then that content is owned by the sponsor. So why is the person in the scene DMCA'ing it?

Because they don't own the content.

99% of these DMCA companies out there suck dick and send out THOUSANDS of false take down requests every single week.

celandina · 12-27-2025, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott

I'm talking about sponsor provided licensed content.

This is what happens:

1. a content producer produces legally licensed content of models to go on paysite/sponsor sites.

2. affiliates promote sponsor sites with that content

3. years pass, the models open their onlyfans/manyvids and work for themselves

4. the models (maybe urged by DMCA services) want to knockout all their old content and all competitors to boost their own OF/MV rankings by DMCA'ing affiliate contents and have their licensed & legal contents removed from Google

This is fraud by the DMCA services and by those who pay them to do it.

RE : 1)

2)

3) OK it happens 4) That is the problem, the content is everywhere and EVERYBODY lost track of the paperwork. MY guess you complaint is legit , but how do you prove it? That, I believe is the crux of the issue.

xxxclusive · 12-27-2025, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelli58

Most of those services don't give a fuck about being whitelisted. Let's say you are right and he's posting sponsored content. Then that content is owned by the sponsor. So why is the person in the scene DMCA'ing it?

Because they don't own the content.

99% of these DMCA companies out there suck dick and send out THOUSANDS of false take down requests every single week.

These services only send smth when it's ordered by someone, they don't move a finger without payment.

If the DMCA is about actress then it's likely an actress (or her agency) which now does OF and wants to get rid of her former content for 3rd parties. This would be fraud.

If DMCAs are about labels it's likely the label which wants to remove pirated content, but the person in charge possibly doesnt know about all the sponsor sites. This would be unintentional collateral damage.

mechanicvirus · 12-27-2025, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxclusive

These services only send smth when it's ordered by someone, they don't move a finger without payment.

If the DMCA is about actress then it's likely an actress (or her agency) which now does OF and wants to get rid of her former content for 3rd parties. This would be fraud.

If DMCAs are about labels it's likely the label which wants to remove pirated content, but the person in charge possibly doesnt know about all the sponsor sites. This would be unintentional collateral damage.

Here's a fun situation. I got a DMCA for a model, so naturally I contact my affiliate manager and double check that everything is cool to promote. They say yes, so I continue onward, submit a counter notice and go about my day.

Alright a few days later, different DMCA, same URL, same model. This continues for a week straight, after every counter notice. Ok, "Hey do I still have permission or what? This DMCA agency says otherwise". "You most definitely have permission".

Ok great, so uh.. who is putting the "hit out" so to speak? Clearly a model or agency. So what happens when I reply back.. "Ok, well it seems this model or agency doesn't want my website, an affiliate promoting your company to exist on Google for her name or terms through your paysite."

"I'm sorry to hear that, tell us what we can do".

Never know how to answer. Go after the model? Cool then she doesn't work for them anymore.

Go after agency? Not a single paysite really does this beyond an angry email and a promise of being whitelisted, and good luck if the agency doesn't respond to anyone.

Fun shit.

jscott · 12-27-2025, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelli58

These automated DMCA companies are THE WORST. So many fucking false DMCA's it's out of hand.

It sure is. You'd think at some point Google would care to remove all the frauds who're abusing their system. They did it with cleaning up duplicate text content, inbound link manipulations, you'd think at some point they'd remove, penalize or ban these companies who are using fraud to manipulate their rankings like this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxclusive

If it's really sponsor provided content it's likely that you are not whitelisted by those sevices, when I use it can whitelist pages where I know they have trailers of my stuff. The DMCAs are automated now and everything that triggers the keywords gets DMCA.

I've tried contacting companies like DMCA Piracy Prevention Inc., they don't respond.

Quote:

Originally Posted by celandina

RE : 1)

2)

3) OK it happens 4) That is the problem, the content is everywhere and EVERYBODY lost track of the paperwork. MY guess you complaint is legit , but how do you prove it? That, I believe is the crux of the issue.

It should be pretty clear when their DMCA's are countered successfully, should be a strike against those who filed the complaint. Seems Google dgaf at all and are supporting the fraudsters.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

You have to CC every paysite contact you have with these DMCA emails.

You will also have to face completely false DMCA companies with zero contact such as:
Leak Cleaner
CopyArmor
DMCA.Red
Self titled "dmca" on the form that is clearly not an agency

Will begin CC'ing paysite/sponsors. Good tip, thanks.

jscott · 12-27-2025, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelli58

Most of those services don't give a fuck about being whitelisted. Let's say you are right and he's posting sponsored content. Then that content is owned by the sponsor. So why is the person in the scene DMCA'ing it?

Because they don't own the content.

99% of these DMCA companies out there suck dick and send out THOUSANDS of false take down requests every single week.

Tons of the DMCA's I have gotten show Onlyfans as the original content source while they're reporting my posts/content that were published before 2016. Onlyfans was created after that. Absolute fraud. Their deceit is 100% deliberate.

pornlaw · 12-27-2025, 11:30 PM

The only thing that is going to stop fraudulent DMCAs is when a group of affiliates/programs join together, pool their resources and file a lawsuit. Or at least put the worst agents and models on notice that they will be sued if it continues.

The DMCA agents are making bank. The models are doing it on purpose to remove competing content. Google doesnt care.

Most of the models dont even understand why this is fraudulent. And the DMCA agencies just send the notices without ever having a human review one.

The only thing that is going to cause the models and DMCA agents to change their behavior is when they have to spend money on a lawyer.

It doesnt have to be me... but it should be someone who understands the adult business.

Otherwise, keep sending counternotices.

xxxclusive · 12-28-2025, 05:53 AM

Take legal action and sue them for damage. I'm always surprised how much shit most people in this biz take and avoid legal action.

pornlaw · 12-28-2025, 08:38 AM

Oh I forgot to post this link to an article I wrote 2 years ago...

https://adultbizlaw.com/2023/03/20/a...edown-notices/

Quote:

If you do have to file a lawsuit, one of the strongest aspects of Section 512(f) is that it also allows a party to recover attorney’s fees for a false takedown notice. These types of cases have rarely been litigated in the past, but it does appear that more and more affiliates are willing to file suit to protect their business and obviously ranking on Google.

In a case filed in June 2022, damages of $7.6 million were demanded by an aggrieved party. According to Engaget.com, a YouTuber by the name of Lord Nazo received copyright takedown notices from CSC Global — the brand protection vendor contracted by game creator Bungie — for uploading tracks from their game Destiny 2’s original soundtrack. While some content creators might remove the offending material or appeal the copyright notice, Nazo, whose real name is Nicholas Minor, allegedly made the ill-fated decision to impersonate CSC Global and issue dozens of fake DMCA notices to his fellow creators. Bungie is now suing him for a whopping $7.6 million.

Read the entire story here -> https://www.engadget.com/bungie-sues...000022846.html

This is obviously a case that involves willfully filing numerous false DMCA takedown notices which is why CSC Global is asking for such a huge amount of damages.

There is a case that better illustrates what you can recover in DMCA litigation. In Automattic Inc. v. Steiner, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182295 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2014), in a lawsuit filed in response to a false DMCA claim with WordPress, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California awarded Automattic $960 in damages for Hotham’s lost work and time, $1860 for time spent by Automattic’s employees, and $22,264 for attorneys’ fees incurred by Automattic.

That decision is almost 10 years old, but it does give an affiliate a reasonable amount to demand in regard to settlement. And depending on the sheer volume and damages caused by the false DMCA takedown notice, it would not be unreasonable to ask for $100 to $500 per false takedown notice in addition to your attorney’s fees.

If you are an affiliate and are inundated with false DMCA notices, you can take a more aggressive approach and resolve the issue and possibly recover damages in a settlement.

LouiseLloyd · 12-28-2025, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxclusive

Take legal action and sue them for damage. I'm always surprised how much shit most people in this biz take and avoid legal action.

Most notices (lumen/google) display a name that can't be tracked back to an entity to file a claim against, and even if they do offer some form of alias that you could connect to an entity they could simply claim they did not file the notice as defence resulting in more time and money down the shitter.

mechanicvirus · 12-28-2025, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxclusive

Take legal action and sue them for damage. I'm always surprised how much shit most people in this biz take and avoid legal action.

I'm very close to considering this with Leak Cleaner, I really really want discovery on that one to see who they are.

mechanicvirus · 12-28-2025, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornlaw

Oh I forgot to post this link to an article I wrote 2 years ago...

https://adultbizlaw.com/2023/03/20/a...edown-notices/

Thanks Michael, I appreciate your information on this matter, you are always helpful.

mechanicvirus · 12-28-2025, 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott

I've tried contacting companies like DMCA Piracy Prevention Inc., they don't respond.

Just so you know, BranditScan are the same company, try contacting them about DMCA Piracy Prevention notices.

money biz · 12-28-2025, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geirlur

I use an old program caleld TypeItIn so I don't have to write the same stuff all the time..
probably better tools for this but that's the one I've always used

Hah I used that tool for years also. I had chat gtp code me some copy and paste tools in PHP so I can do stuff from my phone using browser.

nnweb · 12-29-2025, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

Just so you know, BranditScan are the same company, try contacting them about DMCA Piracy Prevention notices.

I'm dealing with this shit too now. They don't even bother looking at your site/pages. From the GSC dumps to big query I did manage to get my hands on their super duper AI deep scanning technology though:

Code:

intext:"molly-rimmers" (leaked or download or free or watch)

That's DMCA Piracy Prevention and if its BranditScan maybe you'd get a response from them. I think the Estonia guys wouldn't even respond.

Kelli58 · 12-29-2025, 10:53 AM

It's getting really out of hand. One of the worst for me lately is Ricky Johnson. I don't even want to fucking post his press releases anymore knowing I'm going to get a DMCA take down notice for it because of the rando girl in the scene. It's getting so fucking old.

mechanicvirus · 12-30-2025, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelli58

It's getting really out of hand. One of the worst for me lately is Ricky Johnson. I don't even want to fucking post his press releases anymore knowing I'm going to get a DMCA take down notice for it because of the rando girl in the scene. It's getting so fucking old.

Isn't Ricky Johnson always at industry events? Guess it's time for a guerilla interview like how Leno did but with DMCA notices.

12-25-2025, 01:23 PM	#1
jscott jscizzle Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Taipei Posts: 25,253	Fradulent DMCA's from DMCA Piracy Prevention While we are all busy enjoying Xmas, opening presents & eating casseroles, DMCA Privacy Prevention was busy sending out fraudulent DMCA's hoping they could help their clients delist legal content from Google to help their client rankings (what other reason would there before sending their massive amounts of fraud DMCA's for legal licensed contents). The frauds that run DMCA Privacy Prevention and/or the clients that hire them should be ashamed at what their business has become. To anyone receiving these, make sure you always file counter-DMCA's, I believe someday Google will do what's right and ban/block/destroy companies that thrive on fraudulent activity like this. Merry Xmas to you all, aside from anyone who does business with, works for, or runs DMCA Privacy Prevention Inc. __________________ “If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of.” —Jordan B. Peterson Listen to Pomp tell why is Bitcoin important

12-25-2025, 04:02 PM	#4
Reno78 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2017 Posts: 86	DMCA Piracy Prevention is the worst of all similar companies. About six months ago, they sent me up to 100 fraudulent DMCA notices a day for 10 days straight. In total, they managed to remove about 1,300 URLs from Google, including those with the highest traffic. It was a nightmare. I lost a third of my traffic. I contacted them several times and asked them to stop. Finally, I got a response from them saying that they would put me on their blacklist. I don't know if they really did, but it stopped after ten days. Of course, I sent counter-notices to all of their DMCA notices. Just filling out all the forms every day took me an hour or two. It took four months for Google to respond and gradually start returning the URLs to the search results. I had given up hope. I did a 301 redirect for the most important URLs to get them back into Google. It's been half a year now, but every day I'm afraid it will start again. They are capable of destroying any website that has traffic from Google. It doesn't matter how big your website is. They are capable of sending DMCA notices with 200 URLs a day or even more. Google won't do anything about it. I wrote them several emails and filled out several of their contact forms before I finally got a response. They said it's their policy to remove URLs after they receive a DMCA complaint. They told me to file a counter-notification and they might return the URLs to the results. The only thing I've noticed is that Google now responds much faster to counter-notices. It no longer takes four months, but maybe two days. __________________ My website: My Pornstar Book

12-25-2025, 04:53 PM	#5
Reno78 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2017 Posts: 86	A few more things. There's no way to defend against it. They use a script to download all URLs for a specific website directly from Google results. It's not complicated. Then they send a DMCA and don't even bother to check if there is any content on those URLs. The DMCA contained URLs to pages that were on the first page of Google, as well as URLs that had no traffic or were even redirected, but were simply indexed by Google. The worst part is that it all happens automatically. Everything is handled by a computer. They send DMCA notices 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. No one at Google checks their DMCA complaints. A DMCA notice arrives and the URL is automatically deleted from Google. I don't know how they got that status. With other companies, Google at least verifies the formalities. Or it has happened to me that I received a DMCA notice and a few hours later an email from Google saying that they had checked it, recognized it as an unjustified complaint, and returned the URL to the results themselves. And usually, Google doesn't send complaints from other companies right away. The claim date is a few days ago. But with DMCA Piracy Prevention, those notices come in real time. Easily 50 per hour. Before you can fill out one counter-notice, you'll get 20 more DMCA notices. There are other companies like Bruqi, Leak Cleaner, Traqeer, but none of them are as bad as DMCA Piracy Prevention. __________________ My website: My Pornstar Book

12-26-2025, 01:24 AM	#6
natkejs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Nomad Land Posts: 1,640	I counter them automatically using AI, costs me like $30 per 100 counter notices. It's not perfect but it helps keep them at bay during periods when getting hit hard. Don't mind sharing my solution, it's not advanced, not even that good but it kinds of works. Lets see if I get around to making a thread about it. Surely someone could make it much better. __________________

12-26-2025, 03:31 PM	#11
Kelli58 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 2,224	These automated DMCA companies are THE WORST. So many fucking false DMCA's it's out of hand. __________________ 💎 Earn Money by Helping Content Creators Earn More. 💎 The most unique affiliate program in the game. There are more than 1.5 million OnlyFans creators. Here's your chance to make money from them!

12-26-2025, 04:03 AM	#7
celandina Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 11,562	I do not get it.They are taking down YOUR ORIGINALLY created content? Or likely pirated ( oops sorry ) I mean " user submitted" content to a tube?

12-26-2025, 11:37 AM	#10
mechanicvirus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Southern California Posts: 4,042	You have to CC every paysite contact you have with these DMCA emails. You will also have to face completely false DMCA companies with zero contact such as: Leak Cleaner CopyArmor DMCA.Red Self titled "dmca" on the form that is clearly not an agency

12-26-2025, 06:03 PM	#12
xxxclusive Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 757	If it's really sponsor provided content it's likely that you are not whitelisted by those sevices, when I use it can whitelist pages where I know they have trailers of my stuff. The DMCAs are automated now and everything that triggers the keywords gets DMCA.

12-26-2025, 11:17 PM	#13
natkejs Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Nomad Land Posts: 1,640	If only they used some type of fingerprinting, but they just target search strings. And with the millions of aspiring models, some names are pretty generic and can fit into many other names or even general niches / descriptions. Extreme example, call yourself Anna and then let these bots loose on your "trademark", but that's basically what's happening. Getting borderline annoying. __________________

12-27-2025, 11:30 PM	#20
pornlaw Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,891	The only thing that is going to stop fraudulent DMCAs is when a group of affiliates/programs join together, pool their resources and file a lawsuit. Or at least put the worst agents and models on notice that they will be sued if it continues. The DMCA agents are making bank. The models are doing it on purpose to remove competing content. Google doesnt care. Most of the models dont even understand why this is fraudulent. And the DMCA agencies just send the notices without ever having a human review one. The only thing that is going to cause the models and DMCA agents to change their behavior is when they have to spend money on a lawyer. It doesnt have to be me... but it should be someone who understands the adult business. Otherwise, keep sending counternotices. __________________ Michael www.AdultBizLaw.com

12-28-2025, 05:53 AM	#21
xxxclusive Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 757	Take legal action and sue them for damage. I'm always surprised how much shit most people in this biz take and avoid legal action.

12-29-2025, 10:53 AM	#29
Kelli58 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Texas Posts: 2,224	It's getting really out of hand. One of the worst for me lately is Ricky Johnson. I don't even want to fucking post his press releases anymore knowing I'm going to get a DMCA take down notice for it because of the rando girl in the scene. It's getting so fucking old. __________________ 💎 Earn Money by Helping Content Creators Earn More. 💎 The most unique affiliate program in the game. There are more than 1.5 million OnlyFans creators. Here's your chance to make money from them!