How could xbiz be so irresponsible? - GoFuckYourself.com

tony286 · 08-31-2004, 10:31 PM

They came out with a article titled:

Crackdown Down Under on Net Porn
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=4997

Its about the Australian government cracking down on CP . It opens with :
Lawmakers in both Australia and New Zealand are cracking down on web porn.

Fucking CP is not web porn, it is a illegal disgusting activity and has nothing to do with web porn or the online adult porn industry. To start a article calling a crack down on CP a crack down on net porn is so fucking irresponsible.

KMR Stitch · 08-31-2004, 10:32 PM

Why don't you email them?

tony286 · 08-31-2004, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KMR Stitch
Why don't you email them?

Because I figured no one would read it , I thought of doing that first to tell you the truth.

boobmaster · 08-31-2004, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
They came out with a article titled:

Crackdown Down Under on Net Porn
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=4997

Its about the Australian government cracking down on CP . It opens with :
Lawmakers in both Australia and New Zealand are cracking down on web porn.

Fucking CP is not web porn, it is a illegal disgusting activity and has nothing to do with web porn or the online adult porn industry. To start a article calling a crack down on CP a crack down on net porn is so fucking irresponsible.

The right wing does not distinguish between 'adult porn' and 'child porn'. They group it all together and claim it harms children. As far as they are concerned, we support CP.

tony286 · 08-31-2004, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
The right wing does not distinguish between 'adult porn' and 'child porn'. They group it all together and claim it harms children. As far as they are concerned, we support CP.

You are right but Xbiz is not the right wing.

pornguy · 08-31-2004, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
The right wing does not distinguish between 'adult porn' and 'child porn'. They group it all together and claim it harms children. As far as they are concerned, we support CP.

I have to agree with you on that one.

They think that we are no better.

Corona · 08-31-2004, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
The right wing does not distinguish between 'adult porn' and 'child porn'. They group it all together and claim it harms children. As far as they are concerned, we support CP.

You are 100% correct.

See boobmaster, I knew there was something that we could agree on.

Playboy or double fisting it's all the same to Asshat and his ilk.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE · 08-31-2004, 10:43 PM

I recall that "porn" is technically a legal term.

mikesouth · 09-01-2004, 01:22 AM

This isn't the first time and it won't be the last.

The common practice of politicians is to create a dragon, then slay it.

Nobody will argue that child porn is bad so whenever the government wants to regulate our behaviour they cloak it as harmful "to the children"

happens all the time, and not just in Oz.....

Libertine · 09-01-2004, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mikesouth
This isn't the first time and it won't be the last.

The common practice of politicians is to create a dragon, then slay it.

Nobody will argue that child porn is bad so whenever the government wants to regulate our behaviour they cloak it as harmful "to the children"

happens all the time, and not just in Oz.....

It would be nice if our industry (xbiz is a part of the adult industry) wouldn't join them in doing that.

HairToStay · 09-01-2004, 06:53 AM

If you read the article, it's not just CP, they are cracking down on hardcore XXX sites as well including rape, torture, etc.

Basic_man · 09-01-2004, 06:55 AM

Xbiz wrote this? weird for sure!

TheWildcard · 09-01-2004, 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
I recall that "porn" is technically a legal term.

welcome back dude

titmowse · 09-01-2004, 07:13 AM

go to google news and type the word "porn" in the search box. the majority of headlines end up being cp-related and rarely focus on adult porn.

Cassie · 09-01-2004, 07:17 AM

you would think after all this time, it would not be called child p o r n but rather
child exploitation or something like that because porn and children DO NOT go together.

porn is for entertainment purposes and adding a child to that mix is just disgusting....it is not porn and it is not entertainment.

those who combine the 2 deserve to have their heads removed.....painfully.

Video-Post · 09-01-2004, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by tony404
Because I figured no one would read it , I thought of doing that first to tell you the truth.

With a beginning like that, reading it would be pointless. Sounds like propaganda to me

08-31-2004, 10:31 PM	#1
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	How could xbiz be so irresponsible? They came out with a article titled: Crackdown Down Under on Net Porn http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=4997 Its about the Australian government cracking down on CP . It opens with : Lawmakers in both Australia and New Zealand are cracking down on web porn. Fucking CP is not web porn, it is a illegal disgusting activity and has nothing to do with web porn or the online adult porn industry. To start a article calling a crack down on CP a crack down on net porn is so fucking irresponsible. Last edited by tony299; 08-31-2004 at 10:32 PM..

08-31-2004, 10:43 PM	#8
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE best designer on GFY Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: IALIEN.COM - High Definition Video and Photographic Productions -ICQ 78943384 Posts: 30,307	I recall that "porn" is technically a legal term. __________________ NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo! \| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily \| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 \|ICQ: 78943384 \|

09-01-2004, 01:22 AM	#9
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	This isn't the first time and it won't be the last. The common practice of politicians is to create a dragon, then slay it. Nobody will argue that child porn is bad so whenever the government wants to regulate our behaviour they cloak it as harmful "to the children" happens all the time, and not just in Oz..... __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

09-01-2004, 06:53 AM	#11
HairToStay Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Southcoast, Mass. Posts: 1,521	If you read the article, it's not just CP, they are cracking down on hardcore XXX sites as well including rape, torture, etc. __________________ Make bank by giving your surfers free pics every day and it costs you NOTHING! Use POTD Sponsors to find adult sponsors in more than 75 niches who offer a POTD feature!

09-01-2004, 06:55 AM	#12
Basic_man Programming King Pin Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Montreal Posts: 27,360	Xbiz wrote this? weird for sure! __________________ UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress! Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

08-31-2004, 10:32 PM	#2
KMR Stitch I am cool Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 14,494	Why don't you email them?

09-01-2004, 07:13 AM	#14
titmowse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: TEXAS Posts: 5,320	go to google news and type the word "porn" in the search box. the majority of headlines end up being cp-related and rarely focus on adult porn. __________________ I still love everybody

09-01-2004, 07:17 AM	#15
Cassie Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 3,139	you would think after all this time, it would not be called child p o r n but rather child exploitation or something like that because porn and children DO NOT go together. porn is for entertainment purposes and adding a child to that mix is just disgusting....it is not porn and it is not entertainment. those who combine the 2 deserve to have their heads removed.....painfully. __________________ ICQ: 309756847 ]