Iowa makes shooting for profit a felony - GoFuckYourself.com

cspdinc · 01-29-2009, 02:15 AM

Paid shoots of actors for profit are now felony convictions under a new proposed adult trafficing law.

It was orginally wrote to capture pimps who brought young chics from chi town and made them dance at little clubs around the midwest. But lawmakers included ANY for-profit endevour involving sex (of legal age adults inc mind you) and specificlly pointed out website shoots/photpgraphers where actors are hired to perform as being punishable as a felony and 10-15 yrs sentences. Does melissa midwest still shoot? hm.

So...
no shooting there!
dumb asses; I can hear their bibles banging from here.

After Shock Media · 01-29-2009, 02:18 AM

Well that will not really stick at any higher courts, bound to fuck with someone or a few people first though.

Sly · 01-29-2009, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cspdinc

Paid shoots of actors for profit are now felony convictions under a new proposed adult trafficing law.

It was orginally wrote to capture pimps who brought young chics from chi town and made them dance at little clubs around the midwest. But lawmakers included ANY for-profit endevour involving sex (of legal age adults inc mind you) and specificlly pointed out website shoots/photpgraphers where actors are hired to perform as being punishable as a felony and 10-15 yrs sentences. Does melissa midwest still shoot? hm.

So...
no shooting there!
dumb asses; I can hear their bibles banging from here.

Iowa really isn't a Bible banger state. The state typically votes Democrat and has a pretty strong union presence. This is just a stupid law that somebody snuck in and will get struck down once fought. Talk about a waste of time...

pornguy · 01-29-2009, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Well that will not really stick at any higher courts, bound to fuck with someone or a few people first though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Iowa really isn't a Bible banger state. The state typically votes Democrat and has a pretty strong union presence. This is just a stupid law that somebody snuck in and will get struck down once fought. Talk about a waste of time...

Thats the problem. ONCE they get it to court. In the mean time, they have been arrested, Put in jail and had to either post bond, or wait till trial, had to hire an attoreny, and there is NO WAY to recoup that lost money. The State will NOT HAVE TO pay damages even if it's against your rights. And in MOST states, that record will stay with them FOREVER.

sortie · 01-29-2009, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cspdinc

Paid shoots of actors for profit are now felony convictions under a new proposed adult trafficing law.

It was orginally wrote to capture pimps who brought young chics from chi town and made them dance at little clubs around the midwest. But lawmakers included ANY for-profit endevour involving sex (of legal age adults inc mind you) and specificlly pointed out website shoots/photpgraphers where actors are hired to perform as being punishable as a felony and 10-15 yrs sentences. Does melissa midwest still shoot? hm.

So...
no shooting there!
dumb asses; I can hear their bibles banging from here.

Just upload the video to youporn then say "Ok where's the profit?"

Connor · 01-29-2009, 12:14 PM

The Iowa circuit courts aren't bound by the decisions that affect CA and I believe NH. They could decide to let the law stand.

G-Rotica · 01-29-2009, 02:59 PM

You got a source on this? I live in Iowa and have to see anything about this.

NaughtyRob · 01-29-2009, 03:00 PM

Thats fucked up.

jmcb420 · 01-29-2009, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor

The Iowa circuit courts aren't bound by the decisions that affect CA and I believe NH. They could decide to let the law stand.

Any federal court would strike that down in a few short minutes. But its like pornguy said, in the meantime.........

pornlaw · 01-29-2009, 05:33 PM

Here's an article from the Des Moines Register...

At this point, the law hasnt passed. It passed the Iowa Senate and is heading to the House, then it has to go to the Gov.

Bill includes forced stripping in human trafficking ban

It would be illegal to make a profit by forcing someone to strip at a club under changes to the state?s human trafficking law that received Iowa Senate approval today.

The bill would prohibit making money from forcing a person of any age to do a live or public act meant to arouse sexual desire.

?Sexually explicit performances? would include sexual acts in front of a camera for a paid Internet site, or pornographic photos that are then sold, said state Sen. Steve Sodders, a Democrat from State Center.

The crime is a felony, but the punishment depends on the age of the victim.

The bill, Senate File 27, passed 50-0. It now goes to the House.

tony286 · 01-29-2009, 05:38 PM

didnt they think about, its goes to court and porn wins its legal to shoot porn in iowa no more grey.It becomes the la of the midwest.

Barefootsies · 01-29-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Iowa really isn't a Bible banger state. The state typically votes Democrat and has a pretty strong union presence. This is just a stupid law that somebody snuck in and will get struck down once fought. Talk about a waste of time...

BVF · 01-29-2009, 06:21 PM

Fuck Iowa.

Ethersync · 01-29-2009, 06:56 PM

If this becomes law will it mean people can't work on cam sites if they are from Iowa?

collegeboobies · 01-29-2009, 06:59 PM

its just Iowa

boudoir · 01-29-2009, 07:25 PM

"force" ... so just get a signed release confirming that the actor/model is not coerced.

pr0 · 01-29-2009, 07:29 PM

Anyone we know really live in Iowa?

SmokeyTheBear · 01-29-2009, 08:31 PM

sounds like the debate would stem from the word "forced" , if you have a contract how would they prove you "forced" someone

Joshua G · 01-29-2009, 09:10 PM

We should give Iowa back to France & demand a refund

LiveDose · 01-29-2009, 09:11 PM

The freaks who pushed that law are probably the same people fucking sheep at night in the back of a barn.

BTW Melissa is not in Iowa.

DaddyHalbucks · 01-29-2009, 09:14 PM

Iowa is the most boring state I have ever visited.

chadknowslaw · 01-29-2009, 10:31 PM

The proposal does NOT make shooting content illegal!!

The changes are to the human trafficking law. Here are the important sections:

4. "Human trafficking" means participating in a venture to
recruit, harbor, transport, supply provisions, or obtain a person for
any of the following purposes:
a. Forced labor or service that results in involuntary
servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.
b. Commercial sexual activity through the use of force,
fraud, or coercion, except that if the trafficked person is under the
age of eighteen, the commercial sexual activity need not involve
force, fraud, or coercion.

And the proposed changes:

FROM

"Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act on
behalf of which anything of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and
includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation
in the production of pornography, and performance in strip clubs.

TO:

1 1 Section 1. Section 710A.1, subsection 1, Code 2009, is
1 2 amended to read as follows:
1 3 1. "Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act or sexually explicit performance for which anything
1 5 of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and
1 6 includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation
1 7 in the production of pornography, and performance in strip
1 8 clubs.

This does not affect legitimate production or strip clubs -- it is part of the human trafficking law that makes it a crime to force someone into sexual slavery.

Spunky · 01-29-2009, 10:39 PM

I'd move pretty damn quick,north to Alaska

MuleScrote · 01-30-2009, 12:16 AM

I'm in Iowa...

I was told it was illegal to shoot anything hardcore in Iowa about 8 yrs ago. It's probably a new law to better include the internet in legislation.

I had equipment already and wife was recruiting talent. Talk about a bummer...

potter · 01-30-2009, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadknowslaw

The proposal does NOT make shooting content illegal!!

The changes are to the human trafficking law. Here are the important sections:

4. "Human trafficking" means participating in a venture to
recruit, harbor, transport, supply provisions, or obtain a person for
any of the following purposes:
a. Forced labor or service that results in involuntary
servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.
b. Commercial sexual activity through the use of force,
fraud, or coercion, except that if the trafficked person is under the
age of eighteen, the commercial sexual activity need not involve
force, fraud, or coercion.

And the proposed changes:

FROM

"Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act on
behalf of which anything of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and
includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation
in the production of pornography, and performance in strip clubs.

TO:

1 1 Section 1. Section 710A.1, subsection 1, Code 2009, is
1 2 amended to read as follows:
1 3 1. "Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act or sexually explicit performance for which anything
1 5 of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and
1 6 includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation
1 7 in the production of pornography, and performance in strip
1 8 clubs.

This does not affect legitimate production or strip clubs -- it is part of the human trafficking law that makes it a crime to force someone into sexual slavery.

If the person is already being "forced", what's the stop them from being "forced" to sign a contract saying they aren't being "forced"?

It really makes no sense....

ztik · 01-30-2009, 02:11 AM

FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED

Not hard to read..

quantum-x · 01-30-2009, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sortie

Just upload the video to youporn then say "Ok where's the profit?"

Off topic, but youporn is a legal tube

01-29-2009, 02:15 AM	#1
cspdinc Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: USA land of the oppressed Posts: 724	Iowa makes shooting for profit a felony Paid shoots of actors for profit are now felony convictions under a new proposed adult trafficing law. It was orginally wrote to capture pimps who brought young chics from chi town and made them dance at little clubs around the midwest. But lawmakers included ANY for-profit endevour involving sex (of legal age adults inc mind you) and specificlly pointed out website shoots/photpgraphers where actors are hired to perform as being punishable as a felony and 10-15 yrs sentences. Does melissa midwest still shoot? hm. So... no shooting there! dumb asses; I can hear their bibles banging from here.

01-29-2009, 02:18 AM	#2
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Well that will not really stick at any higher courts, bound to fuck with someone or a few people first though. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

01-29-2009, 12:14 PM	#6
Connor Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 1,294	The Iowa circuit courts aren't bound by the decisions that affect CA and I believe NH. They could decide to let the law stand. __________________ YNOT v5 IS NOW LIVE! \| SEEN YNOT MAIL YET?

01-29-2009, 02:59 PM	#7
G-Rotica Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 4,258	You got a source on this? I live in Iowa and have to see anything about this. __________________

01-29-2009, 03:00 PM	#8
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	Thats fucked up. __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

01-29-2009, 05:33 PM	#10
pornlaw Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 1,873	Here's an article from the Des Moines Register... At this point, the law hasnt passed. It passed the Iowa Senate and is heading to the House, then it has to go to the Gov. Bill includes forced stripping in human trafficking ban It would be illegal to make a profit by forcing someone to strip at a club under changes to the state?s human trafficking law that received Iowa Senate approval today. The bill would prohibit making money from forcing a person of any age to do a live or public act meant to arouse sexual desire. ?Sexually explicit performances? would include sexual acts in front of a camera for a paid Internet site, or pornographic photos that are then sold, said state Sen. Steve Sodders, a Democrat from State Center. The crime is a felony, but the punishment depends on the age of the victim. The bill, Senate File 27, passed 50-0. It now goes to the House. __________________ Michael www.AdultBizLaw.com

01-29-2009, 05:38 PM	#11
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	didnt they think about, its goes to court and porn wins its legal to shoot porn in iowa no more grey.It becomes the la of the midwest.

01-29-2009, 06:21 PM	#13
BVF Black Vagina Finder Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: The Midwest Posts: 13,975	Fuck Iowa. __________________ Black Pussy Click On Mr Cosby..CCbill, 60/40, 136 FHG's....The Cos Loves Black Ghetto Pussy!!

01-29-2009, 06:56 PM	#14
Ethersync Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, Saint-Tropez, Bermuda, Moscow Posts: 5,289	If this becomes law will it mean people can't work on cam sites if they are from Iowa?

01-29-2009, 06:59 PM	#15
collegeboobies So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 3,644	its just Iowa

01-29-2009, 07:25 PM	#16
boudoir Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: South! Posts: 211	"force" ... so just get a signed release confirming that the actor/model is not coerced. __________________ [email protected] / ICQ #28 653 489 Creating quality glamour & art content just for you! Contact me for more info and rates. www.boudoir-art.com/content

01-29-2009, 07:29 PM	#17
pr0 rockin tha trailerpark Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: ~Coastal~ Posts: 23,088	Anyone we know really live in Iowa? __________________ __________ Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

01-29-2009, 08:31 PM	#18
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	sounds like the debate would stem from the word "forced" , if you have a contract how would they prove you "forced" someone __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

01-29-2009, 09:10 PM	#19
Joshua G dumb libs love censorship Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 8,198	We should give Iowa back to France & demand a refund

01-29-2009, 09:11 PM	#20
LiveDose Show Yer Tits! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Somewhere Out there... Posts: 25,792	The freaks who pushed that law are probably the same people fucking sheep at night in the back of a barn. BTW Melissa is not in Iowa. __________________ Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal

01-29-2009, 09:14 PM	#21
DaddyHalbucks A freakin' legend! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA Posts: 18,975	Iowa is the most boring state I have ever visited. __________________ Boner Money

01-29-2009, 10:31 PM	#22
chadknowslaw Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Phoenix, Arizona Posts: 343	The proposal does NOT make shooting content illegal!! The changes are to the human trafficking law. Here are the important sections: 4. "Human trafficking" means participating in a venture to recruit, harbor, transport, supply provisions, or obtain a person for any of the following purposes: a. Forced labor or service that results in involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery. b. Commercial sexual activity through the use of force, fraud, or coercion, except that if the trafficked person is under the age of eighteen, the commercial sexual activity need not involve force, fraud, or coercion. And the proposed changes: FROM "Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act on behalf of which anything of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation in the production of pornography, and performance in strip clubs. TO: 1 1 Section 1. Section 710A.1, subsection 1, Code 2009, is 1 2 amended to read as follows: 1 3 1. "Commercial sexual activity" means any sex act or sexually explicit performance for which anything 1 5 of value is given, promised to, or received by any person and 1 6 includes, but is not limited to, prostitution, participation 1 7 in the production of pornography, and performance in strip 1 8 clubs. This does not affect legitimate production or strip clubs -- it is part of the human trafficking law that makes it a crime to force someone into sexual slavery. __________________ ChadKnowsLaw

01-29-2009, 10:39 PM	#23
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,934	I'd move pretty damn quick,north to Alaska __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

01-30-2009, 12:16 AM	#24
MuleScrote Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 4,601	I'm in Iowa... I was told it was illegal to shoot anything hardcore in Iowa about 8 yrs ago. It's probably a new law to better include the internet in legislation. I had equipment already and wife was recruiting talent. Talk about a bummer... __________________ ICQ 78681003

01-30-2009, 02:11 AM	#26
ztik Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Nomad Posts: 5,196	FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED FORCED Not hard to read.. __________________ .