Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon? - GoFuckYourself.com

mizmiz · 07-24-2011, 04:41 PM

Or was it some drunk Russian?

SallyRand · 07-24-2011, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizmiz

Or was it some drunk Russian?

No it was Armstrong.

Aluminum Foil Beanie people think it was not.

In the meantime, enjoy this video:

Overload · 07-24-2011, 05:00 PM

i doubt it somehow ... too many extra sharp pics from "there" ... and haircrosses BEHIND the photographed objects ... FAIL :P

SallyRand · 07-24-2011, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overload

i doubt it somehow ... too many extra sharp pics from "there" ... and haircrosses BEHIND the photographed objects ... FAIL :P

L-Pink · 07-24-2011, 05:06 PM

candyflip · 07-24-2011, 05:11 PM

My friends are writing a screenplay about Stanley Kubrick and the rumor that he directed the fake moon landing.

There is some interesting info to support the theory, but the movie will be entirely fictional.

AnimeFevers · 07-24-2011, 05:15 PM

My space teacher told me that its not true, really he did...

Phoenix · 07-24-2011, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

My friends are writing a screenplay about Stanley Kubrick and the rumor that he directed the fake moon landing.

There is some interesting info to support the theory, but the movie will be entirely fictional.

he 100% shot the film...the reasons behind it are unclear though

i think they got up there and hadnt realized their film would be exposed the second they got out of the capsule.

so all the footage they got outside the capsule was lost.

just my opinion...well and the maker of the cameras they used, he himself says it was just the standard camera..painted grey

candyflip · 07-24-2011, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

he 100% shot the film...the reasons behind it are unclear though

i think they got up there and hadnt realized their film would be exposed the second they got out of the capsule.

so all the footage they got outside the capsule was lost.

just my opinion...well and the maker of the cameras they used, he himself says it was just the standard camera..painted grey

Yeah...they've got some pretty interesting info that they've dug up. It should make for a good story when all is said and done.

mikesouth · 07-24-2011, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

he 100% shot the film...the reasons behind it are unclear though

i think they got up there and hadnt realized their film would be exposed the second they got out of the capsule.

so all the footage they got outside the capsule was lost.

just my opinion...well and the maker of the cameras they used, he himself says it was just the standard camera..painted grey

Hmmm you think we figured out how to send humans beings through the van allen radiation belt unharmed, through temperature extremes ranging from almost absolute zero to fri the whole capsule to a crisp if you come in at the wrong angle. We figured out how to not bounce off the earths atmosphere, we figured out how tol slingshot around the moon using gravity to conserve fuel, we over came over a million technical difficulties to get men to the moon and back alive and we didn't know the film had to be in radiation proof containers.

Good God people....you do realize how totally IGNORANT that is right?

Best-In-BC · 07-24-2011, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overload

i doubt it somehow ... too many extra sharp pics from "there" ... and haircrosses BEHIND the photographed objects ... FAIL :P

The stupidity of the world everybody

Best-In-BC · 07-24-2011, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Somebody finally got it right, ROFL

DBS.US · 07-24-2011, 08:58 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=B_ubiPSTM1c

Shoplifter · 07-24-2011, 09:10 PM

lol

Please see: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

DBS.US · 07-24-2011, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoplifter

lol

Please see: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

Fake

Rochard · 07-24-2011, 09:37 PM

Not this shit again.

DBS.US · 07-24-2011, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overload

i doubt it somehow ... too many extra sharp pics from "there" ... and haircrosses BEHIND the photographed objects ... FAIL :P

The photos where very nice considering they had no flash or viewfinder

raymor · 07-25-2011, 12:14 AM

Check out the Mythbusters episode on this topic. It's an interesting topic because there ARE a few things that seem really odd. However, when you look into it with a truly open mind none of the conspiracy theory ideas hold up. Often, simply seeing another picture of the same object from a different angle makes it clear.

For example, several of the claims are based on the idea that "since the sun is the only light source on the moon, anything in a shadow should be completely black". That makes sense until you look at the moon in the sky. Looking at the moon, you see it's quite bright. If you go out in the country at night, moonlight is enough to see a liitle bit. If the light from the moon's surface can light up stuff here, 250,000 miles away, it's certainly enough to soften shadows just a few feet from the surface.

Also try this. Put on a white T shirt, the same color as the astronauts suits. Take a bright flashlight into a dark room and point it toward your shirt. It will light up the whole room. Similarly, sunlight reflected off of the astronauts suits threw some light on the things around them. So the sun it's NOT the only light source on the moon, and you can see that just by looking up at the moon and seeing how bright the whole surface is.

Each claim by the conspiracy theorists can be debunked quite simply. Until you see these things, though, it is quite fascinating to read the claims and look at their "evidence". It's almost disappointing to debunk the claims just by looking up and saying "damn, the whole friggin surface of tge moon is shining brightly".

chaze · 07-25-2011, 01:38 AM

I would guess no, but it will never be proved either way.

It is silly to think the government wouldn't fake it. Of course they would.

But they would also rather do it in real.

It's all just a pissing contest so who cares!

JFK · 07-25-2011, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

THANKS EH, it's about time the truth came out

seeandsee · 07-25-2011, 03:34 AM

this is pic from NASA site, and am i crazy or shadow of modul is on right and stones have shadow on the left?

mavruda · 07-25-2011, 04:16 AM

http://actionstories.blogspot.com/20...t-on-moon.html

cherrylula · 07-25-2011, 04:40 AM

This is my favorite thread topic ever! lol

I know a guy who works for NASA, even he says it was fake. so duh.

PR_Glen · 07-25-2011, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula

This is my favorite thread topic ever! lol

I know a guy who works for NASA, even he says it was fake. so duh.

case closed!

Tom_PM · 07-25-2011, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee

this is pic from NASA site, and am i crazy or shadow of modul is on right and stones have shadow on the left?

You're seeing the shadow being cast down into the bowl of the crater. Gives them the illusion of being mounds in that harsh light.

candyflip · 07-25-2011, 06:14 AM

CaptainHowdy · 07-25-2011, 06:25 AM

sperbonzo · 07-25-2011, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee

this is pic from NASA site, and am i crazy or shadow of modul is on right and stones have shadow on the left?

You're not crazy, just incorrect. The "stones" that you are looking at are actually craters.

.

Phoenix · 07-25-2011, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Hmmm you think we figured out how to send humans beings through the van allen radiation belt unharmed, through temperature extremes ranging from almost absolute zero to fri the whole capsule to a crisp if you come in at the wrong angle. We figured out how to not bounce off the earths atmosphere, we figured out how tol slingshot around the moon using gravity to conserve fuel, we over came over a million technical difficulties to get men to the moon and back alive and we didn't know the film had to be in radiation proof containers.

Good God people....you do realize how totally IGNORANT that is right?

hey im sure you have investigated all of this
maybe the maker of the camera was wrong..maybe he is lying
but it stands that he says he did nothing special to the camera...they just mounted it on the spacesuits and went outside with them

we figured out a lot of stuff....penicillin was an accident

JamesGw · 07-25-2011, 08:33 AM

I'm pretty certain they went to the moon. None of the so-called evidence that conspiracy theorists have really holds up when thoroughly inspected and analyzed.

scarlettcontent · 07-25-2011, 08:33 AM

no one has been 2 the moon

lazycash · 07-25-2011, 08:39 AM

More people to add to the gfy nutcase conspiracy list.

Phoenix (lifetime member)
dbs.us
overload
wehateporn
chaze
cherrylula

PR_Glen · 07-25-2011, 08:44 AM

Here's the question that bothers me most about the 'production' claims...

If it was all done in a studio, a complete hoax, a huge cover up why would they even bother claiming to go back? wouldn't that be more chance at leaks? wouldn't the public start getting more skeptical? Wouldn't a 'rogue employee' spill the beans at some point in the years of going there? Of course that would happen... but it didn't. The evidence proving they went there far outweighs any of the claims that it is all fake. I'll admit it makes for an interesting story, but it just ends right there...

Phoenix · 07-25-2011, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash

More people to add to the gfy nutcase conspiracy list.

Phoenix (lifetime member)
dbs.us
overload
wehateporn
chaze
cherrylula

hey you fat fuck

im talking about film being ruined from radiation
not whether or not anyone went to the moon

there is a big difference

if you knew how to read, you would know that

dyna mo · 07-25-2011, 08:56 AM

quickk question, was just the 1st lunar landing faked? or were all 6 lunar landings over several years faked?

2MuchMark · 07-25-2011, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

The person who made this video is an idiot.

Phoenix · 07-25-2011, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

quickk question, was just the 1st lunar landing faked? or were all 6 lunar landings over several years faked?

i know you are not asking me...but here goes anyway
i think they went to the moon
just the first time...they fucked up and forgot to enclose the film in radiation proof material

thus...the 2km stage in arizona
stanely kubrick conspiracy etc

L-Pink · 07-25-2011, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

quickk question, was just the 1st lunar landing faked? or were all 6 lunar landings over several years faked?

Wat up sputnik?

.

dyna mo · 07-25-2011, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Wat up sputnik?

.

just kicking it

justinsain · 07-25-2011, 09:16 AM

I'm thinking I actually watched Neill Armstrong step on the moon live on TV. I remember my family sitting around the TV and watching it.

If Kubrick staged a moon landing to " replace " a damaged original due to radiation, how did he know to do it before the actual live event and what exactly was my family and I watching on tv that day?

TheLegacy · 07-25-2011, 09:16 AM

We live in a cynical society that loves to disbelieve anything

dyna mo · 07-25-2011, 09:25 AM

lazycash · 07-26-2011, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

hey you fat fuck

im talking about film being ruined from radiation
not whether or not anyone went to the moon

there is a big difference

if you knew how to read, you would know that

Lol, fat fuck, hardly, you ready to play some 1 on 1 hoops? You've made plenty of previous posts in regards to the moon landing being fake. Franck isn't here so he asked me to give you a hard time about all your conspiracy talk.

07-24-2011, 04:41 PM	#1
mizmiz So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: Holly Place Posts: 1,168	Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon? Or was it some drunk Russian?

07-24-2011, 05:00 PM	#3
Overload Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Beck's City, North Teutonia Posts: 3,185	i doubt it somehow ... too many extra sharp pics from "there" ... and haircrosses BEHIND the photographed objects ... FAIL :P __________________ There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.

07-24-2011, 05:11 PM	#6
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,057	My friends are writing a screenplay about Stanley Kubrick and the rumor that he directed the fake moon landing. There is some interesting info to support the theory, but the movie will be entirely fictional. __________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

07-24-2011, 05:15 PM	#7
AnimeFevers ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ ▄ █ ▄ █ ▄ ▄ █ ▄ █ Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Tell your mom, money is on the fridge Posts: 3,560	My space teacher told me that its not true, really he did... __________________ tg - @LJFreeza email - animefevers(AT)hotmail(DOT)co(DOT)uk

07-24-2011, 08:58 PM	#13
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	https://youtube.com/watch?v=B_ubiPSTM1c __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

07-24-2011, 05:06 PM	#5
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151

07-24-2011, 09:10 PM	#14
Shoplifter Richest man in Babylon Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Posts: 10,002 Posts: 5,695	lol Please see: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

07-24-2011, 09:37 PM	#16
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,305	Not this shit again. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

07-25-2011, 12:14 AM	#18
raymor Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 3,745	Check out the Mythbusters episode on this topic. It's an interesting topic because there ARE a few things that seem really odd. However, when you look into it with a truly open mind none of the conspiracy theory ideas hold up. Often, simply seeing another picture of the same object from a different angle makes it clear. For example, several of the claims are based on the idea that "since the sun is the only light source on the moon, anything in a shadow should be completely black". That makes sense until you look at the moon in the sky. Looking at the moon, you see it's quite bright. If you go out in the country at night, moonlight is enough to see a liitle bit. If the light from the moon's surface can light up stuff here, 250,000 miles away, it's certainly enough to soften shadows just a few feet from the surface. Also try this. Put on a white T shirt, the same color as the astronauts suits. Take a bright flashlight into a dark room and point it toward your shirt. It will light up the whole room. Similarly, sunlight reflected off of the astronauts suits threw some light on the things around them. So the sun it's NOT the only light source on the moon, and you can see that just by looking up at the moon and seeing how bright the whole surface is. Each claim by the conspiracy theorists can be debunked quite simply. Until you see these things, though, it is quite fascinating to read the claims and look at their "evidence". It's almost disappointing to debunk the claims just by looking up and saying "damn, the whole friggin surface of tge moon is shining brightly". __________________ For historical display only. This information is not current: support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627 Strongbox - The next generation in site security Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

07-25-2011, 01:38 AM	#19
chaze Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 9,752	I would guess no, but it will never be proved either way. It is silly to think the government wouldn't fake it. Of course they would. But they would also rather do it in real. It's all just a pissing contest so who cares!

07-25-2011, 03:34 AM	#21
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	this is pic from NASA site, and am i crazy or shadow of modul is on right and stones have shadow on the left? __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

07-25-2011, 04:16 AM	#22
mavruda porn cartoonist Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vatican City Posts: 2,598	http://actionstories.blogspot.com/20...t-on-moon.html

07-25-2011, 04:40 AM	#23
cherrylula lol Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Posts: 15,969	This is my favorite thread topic ever! lol I know a guy who works for NASA, even he says it was fake. so duh.

07-25-2011, 06:14 AM	#26
candyflip Carpe Visio Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New York Posts: 43,057	__________________ Spend you some brain. Email Me

07-25-2011, 06:25 AM	#27
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,177	__________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

07-25-2011, 08:33 AM	#30
JamesGw Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,237	I'm pretty certain they went to the moon. None of the so-called evidence that conspiracy theorists have really holds up when thoroughly inspected and analyzed. __________________ Giggles.com has a huge selection of sex toys. Need backlinks? Ask to guest post on our adult blog.

07-25-2011, 08:33 AM	#31
scarlettcontent www.scarlettcontent.net Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleiades Posts: 6,031	no one has been 2 the moon __________________ Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print. Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices. Over 40 years in the adult industry. [email protected] Follow us on twitter.

07-25-2011, 08:39 AM	#32
lazycash Troll Patrol Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Local Socal Posts: 15,214	More people to add to the gfy nutcase conspiracy list. Phoenix (lifetime member) dbs.us overload wehateporn chaze cherrylula __________________ "WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams.. Its crazy..." VenusBlogger

07-25-2011, 08:44 AM	#33
PR_Glen Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 9,058	Here's the question that bothers me most about the 'production' claims... If it was all done in a studio, a complete hoax, a huge cover up why would they even bother claiming to go back? wouldn't that be more chance at leaks? wouldn't the public start getting more skeptical? Wouldn't a 'rogue employee' spill the beans at some point in the years of going there? Of course that would happen... but it didn't. The evidence proving they went there far outweighs any of the claims that it is all fake. I'll admit it makes for an interesting story, but it just ends right there... __________________ webmaster at pimproll dot com

07-25-2011, 08:56 AM	#35
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,338	quickk question, was just the 1st lunar landing faked? or were all 6 lunar landings over several years faked?

07-25-2011, 09:16 AM	#40
justinsain Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 3,374	I'm thinking I actually watched Neill Armstrong step on the moon live on TV. I remember my family sitting around the TV and watching it. If Kubrick staged a moon landing to " replace " a damaged original due to radiation, how did he know to do it before the actual live event and what exactly was my family and I watching on tv that day?

07-25-2011, 09:16 AM	#41
TheLegacy SEO Connoisseur Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Brantford, Ontario Posts: 16,540	We live in a cynical society that loves to disbelieve anything __________________ SEO Connoisseur Microsoft Teams: Robert Warren SEO Telegram: @TheLegacy54 RobertWarrenSEO.com

07-25-2011, 09:25 AM	#42
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,338